President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

This is where it started @luthervol

Dude, you’re impossible to converse with.
Take note that it’s the board that was referred not the PF.
And even if you move the goalposts to that thread alone the number wasn’t even 50% who rooted against the ladies soccer team.
Jesus dude you can’t be this dense
Please look at the highlighted part of your post below. Those are your words.

55k people on this board.
No way 8250 of them cared or knew anything about it
Again, I don't care; it's no big deal. I made a relatively insignificant (YET TRUE) statement.
There are some in the PF (I guess you are included), that feel it is their obligation as a true PATRIOT and red blooded trumper to nitpick anything and everything I post. They are pretty much always wrong and it is almost always due to reading what they think I am saying instead of what I am actually saying.

In this instance, you were obviously the mover of the goal posts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
No, I'm not in favor of abortion; it's a barbaric practice that I don't have an answer to except that it be referred to the states as currently exists. If a life-saving procedure is needed by the mother and denied due to shite law, that law should be challenged. No reassignment surgery needed.

Same for screwing with the minds, bodies of minors by ideologically and physically putting them at unnecessary risk by the state even to the point of keeping parents in the dark or threatening to separate them; it's unconscionable and should also be challenged. We should control our border, know who's coming in and whether they provide a net positive or negative to American society. We don't have to care and only concentrate on one thing; I can walk and chew gum at the same time.

Here's some more bold, reiterated in bold: "I think Federal court is the proper place to sort it." and "I like that as a republic, the two are set against each other in reaching resolution to resolve and respect those things."

If that's lawless authoritarianism, it explains your characterizing J6 as an insurrection (if you were).
I didn’t think you were in favor of abortion. I said that your argument is formulated the same way as the classic Roe/Casey defense: emotionally declaiming how bad the outcomes are and declaring that the individual has a right to be free from such bad outcomes.

Like the anbortion argument, the claim of an individual right is extremely thin. There’s no right to be free from all bad outcomes resulting from legislation, and the severity of the outcome doesn’t go into the formation of a right (and even if it were a right, it wouldn’t justify using a blunderbuss to lawlessly withhold funds from the entire state).

The things in bold aren’t that bold, unless they could be called a bold step back from what you were saying before, but I respect the tacit admission that you were wrong before and mostly agree with this new, non-authoritarian version of your argument. No rebuttal.
 
Please look at the highlighted part of your post below. Those are your words.


Again, I don't care; it's no big deal. I made a relatively insignificant (YET TRUE) statement.
There are some in the PF (I guess you are included), that feel it is their obligation as a true PATRIOT and red blooded trumper to nitpick anything and everything I post. They are pretty much always wrong and it is almost always due to reading what they think I am saying instead of what I am actually saying.

In this instance, you were obviously the mover of the goal posts.
I don't think he's a Trumper, but your comment applies to other posters. "Knew you were a leftist", at any criticism of Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
stopped reading right here.
You butted into someone else’s conversation and can’t seem to let your stupidity go.
Nobody asked you. Nobody cares what you think….. especially since you want to argue about something we were not talking about.
Someone else's conversation? Seriously?
The entire conversation was built on my comment that I was for Canada in their game against the US?
And you asked me....as did several others.

But other than those minor details, your post is spot on.
 
Someone else's conversation? Seriously?
The entire conversation was built on my comment that I was for Canada in their game against the US?
And you asked me....as did several others.

But other than those minor details, your post is spot on.
Dude.
I have not read anything you said in months. A policy I’m returning too after I post this.
I was talking to Mercy…the fishing gawd…Percy. You quoted me out of that conversation. And honestly only half as read anything you posted. No conversation is ever built on anything you say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Dude.
I have not read anything you said in months. A policy I’m returning too after I post this.
I was talking to Mercy…the fishing gawd…Percy. You quoted me out of that conversation. And honestly only half as read anything you posted. No conversation is ever built on anything you say.
A genuinely diplomatic deflection, with a touch of class
 
Dude.
I have not read anything you said in months. A policy I’m returning too after I post this.
I was talking to Mercy…the fishing gawd…Percy. You quoted me out of that conversation. And honestly only half as read anything you posted. No conversation is ever built on anything you say.
How odd, seeing as how Mercy's comment was directly related to the conversation built on what I posted.
>Luther roots against the USA in hockey

>Pikachushockedface.jpeg

>75% of the board rooted against the USA women's soccer team

>Crickets

I member.

Less than 15% of the board knew or cared that the USA plays women’s soccer.

I wish I was misremembering but I just checked and the main thread (there were multiple) was 55 pages lmao

55k people on this board.
No way 8250 of them cared or knew anything about it

75% of regular posters in the PF certainly did.

That’s a crazy assertion.
You’re going to need to support that with facts.


Wait, that’s not what you do

Just bumped one of the threads...........go scroll through a few pages and look at the names

So 5-10 people is 75% of Volnation?
You have always struggled with math.
That’s not even 10% of political forum posters

lol........My math abilities far surpass your reading comprehension.
What I actually said was....75% of regular posters in the PF certainly did.

Do this: List the top 100 posters in the PF and then check if you see 75 of their names in the 55 pages of that thread.

Hint...you will. And that will obviously make my statement 100% correct. (if my math is right)

Lol
You’re stricken with a seriously low iq if you think those 5-10 people represent 75% of PF regulars.

Moving the goalposts doesn’t help you there

Where in the hell are you getting the 5-10 number?
There's twice that number in the first 3 pages alone.
jeesh

Did y’all know that 76% of Volnation has TDS.
I’ll bump a thread where loother and 4 others are crying as proof

lol......I think you have forfeited your right to ever comment on anyone's math abilities.

There is no way you can actually believe you are making a valid comparison.
I'll stop it there.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top