NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 25,818
- Likes
- 9,845
The criticism of Elon also isn't the lack of a nuclear family, it's him being a POS at every turn. For someone who works in a church, that poster has a tough time discussing things in good faithsee, this i don't get
it presupposes 1, that everyone left of yourself can even be appropriately described as leftist.
2, that those said leftists (most aren't btw) aren't themselves already members of families, churches, communities that they hold quite dear, and quite sacred.
3. that you, and everyone right of you are not only the defenders of family values, but the very arbiter that defines what those values are
do we need to go over all the Christofascist nutjobs in our government right now who love the hell out of forcing their mistresses to get abortions? what about jerking off men who aren't your sex offender husband in public in the presence of kids? how about being a promiscuous hag with tantric sex obsessed lovers?
thats not even touching on Elon and his test tube children (who he was never spotted with in public til a ceo got whacked). I wont even bother with Trump.
you think people like Huff don't love his wife or kids? wtf is your point?
A skeptic would not believe Elon's "nuh uh" over an actual report with multiple sources (especially after Elon famously got exposed trying to do that with astronauts just days ago)
I've seen no sources. You've provided no sources. You haven't denied that they are unnamed sources.A skeptic would not believe Elon's "nuh uh" over an actual report with multiple sources (especially after Elon famously got exposed trying to do that with astronauts just days ago)
Again, if your head is so far up Elon's ass that you believe him saying "nuh uh, lie" over a Reuters report with 3 different sources, you're welcome to do that, but please stop whining to me about it or pretending that's a good argumentI've seen no sources. You've provided no sources. You haven't denied that they are unnamed sources.
This post basically equates to: "I'll trust who I want to trust."
That's the point. You lectured us about believing claims with no evidence to support them. Here you are again posting claims with no evidence. I mean, squirm and rationalize it all you want. It doesn't change it.
I mean, that all well and good. We all do it. We just don't all get on a soapbox and waggle our finger about it while we do it.
I couldn't care less either way. That's not the point.Again, if your head is so far up Elon's ass that you believe him saying "nuh uh, lie" over a Reuters report with 3 different sources, you're welcome to do that, but please stop whining to me about it or pretending that's a good argument
No, you just can't tell the difference between a compulsive liar saying "nuh uh" and a Reuters report with 3 sources unless they name them all for you. It's a 70 IQ line of thinking and you keep doubling down on it because you're dumb enough to think it's a smart pointI couldn't care less either way. That's not the point.
The point is you lecturing the board about evidence and credulity while you pass on accusations without evidence, with lots of credulity.
It reminds me of the story about a guy that gave a homeless person $20 every Monday for a month. Just to be nice. Not because he deserved it. Just as a gift. The 5th Monday, he walked by and didn't offer any money. The homeless guy yelled, "Hey! Give me my damn money!"He's not only missing your point, but I have no idea why I'm suppose to be upset (I'm guessing here)?
It reminds me of the story about a guy that gave a homeless person $20 every Monday for a month. Just to be nice. Not because he deserved it. Just as a gift. The 5th Monday, he walked by and didn't offer any money. The homeless guy yelled, "Hey! Give me my damn money!"
Entitlement is a strange thing, I guess.
I can see how you may have gotten that from my post, and I apologize if my vocabulary short-hand misrepresented the though. I was using "The Left" as a general term--meaning specifically those that have developed and orchestrated the sociological evolution in question. Not to attack any and every person with liberal leanings. Nor to put halos on any and every person that leans right.see, this i don't get
it presupposes 1, that everyone left of yourself can even be appropriately described as leftist.
2, that those said leftists (most aren't btw) aren't themselves already members of families, churches, communities that they hold quite dear, and quite sacred.
3. that you, and everyone right of you are not only the defenders of family values, but the very arbiter that defines what those values are
do we need to go over all the Christofascist nutjobs in our government right now who love the hell out of forcing their mistresses to get abortions? what about jerking off men who aren't your sex offender husband in public in the presence of kids? how about being a promiscuous hag with tantric sex obsessed lovers?
thats not even touching on Elon and his test tube children (who he was never spotted with in public til a ceo got whacked). I wont even bother with Trump.
you think people like Huff don't love his wife or kids? wtf is your point?
The criticism of Elon also isn't the lack of a nuclear family, it's him being a POS at every turn. For someone who works in a church, that poster has a tough time discussing things in good faith
Sources not being named doesn't mean they don't exist, I wish you were smarter if you're going to passive aggressively mention me every 5 posts
Oh, I'll start. He created a waiting list for Starlink and promised that if you prepaid a deposit, you would get Starlink first when it came to your area. Then when it came to my area, they didn't abide by those who had paid deposits and instead gave it by some other measure that they refused to explain.You’re gonna have to break that down for me. In what regards? What are your biggest POS examples?
I truly don’t understand the distain you and Huff have for him