Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 50,488
- Likes
- 49,296
Hey Mojo, I’m curious as to what you think will change to give him the win. I know you were big on Trump underperforming in swing state rural counties as the reason he lost last time. Will that be different this time? Why do you think so?
News is coming out this week that Trump is responsible for every bad thing that's happened over the last 4 decades.** Just to clarify, I said Trump significantly underperformed in suburban districts nationwide vs typical Rs and vs 2016. Even in bright red MS and TN, he underperformed by several % in Desoto County and Williamson County, for example. This nationwide underperformance in R leaning suburbs carried over to swing state suburban areas. The difference in GA in 2020 was these areas, which carried on a national trend. It's a main reason to believe there wasnt widespread, material fraud**
Why do I think Trump will outperform 3-5 % nationally vs Kamala when compared to 2020:
1. Trump will get back closer to typical R voting levels in suburban districts. He will still underperform here but not to same extent as 2020. This will flip GA, AZ, and PA. These areas vote based on economy.
2. Trump will make minor inroads with women vs 2020. You ever tried to pull a fast one on your wife? She spots it quick. She may not say anything but she spots it. Women know a phony and they know Kamala is a phony. They trusted a career politician in Joe more than Kamala.
3. Trump will continue to make minor inroads with Hispanic, black male, and Muslim vote. Not big numbers but working class message helps. Im curious to see how NM votes. NM is very blue but does it set itself up to be a swing state in 2028.
The combination of these 3 flips 6 or 7 of the battlegrounds to Trump IMO, pending a late surprise.
News is coming out this week that Trump is responsible for every bad thing that's happened over the last 4 decades.
Exxon Valadez
Northridge Earthquake
Mt St Helens
Aids
9-11
Saban going to Alabama
...and more too numerous to list.
He will definitely lose now, right?
Oh yeah. The way the “Non partisan” groups fact check is hilarious.Notice the difference in language on abortion and guns by the media.
Trump mentions that he’d be open to setting a limit around 16 weeks (going off memory but I’m pretty certain it was 16). Media and Harris: “Trump supports abortion ban!”
Harris wants to force people to turnover certain weapons she opposes. Media and Harris: “VP Harris has never called for gun confiscation”
That was probably from Joe Rogan, unless he's said it a couple different times.I watched some interview Trump did the other day....and I found it refreshing for him to admit that...live no note sor pre read statement...just..bam...he messed up by trusting the wrong people..he didn't have the experience to choose correctly..he does now
And my point is not about the rest of Nebraska. It's about an educated, largely white metro area that has historically gone Republican or narrowly for Dems. Harris is smoking Trump there. If Harris performs like this in the suburbs you three-toothed yokels can vote 100% for Trump in your backwater hollers and Harris will still win.So because of the way Nebraska breaks up their votes.View attachment 691749
And my point is not about the rest of Nebraska. It's about an educated, largely white metro area that has historically gone Republican or narrowly for Dems. Harris is smoking Trump there. If Harris performs like this in the suburbs you three-toothed yokels can vote 100% for Trump in your backwater hollers and Harris will still win.
This is hilarious, I hope everyone sees this.And my point is not about the rest of Nebraska. It's about an educated, largely white metro area that has historically gone Republican or narrowly for Dems. Harris is smoking Trump there. If Harris performs like this in the suburbs you three-toothed yokels can vote 100% for Trump in your backwater hollers and Harris will still win.