2024 Presidential Race

#51,078
#51,078
Franklin Pierce said:

Outrage Over Kamala Harris Article About Her Dress Sense: 'Frankly revolting'​


The Daily Beast released an op-ed on Tuesday that angered people over its 'sexist' statements about Vice President Kamala Harris and her fashion choices.

The controversial piece was titled Kamala Harris Is Well-Suited for President—but Poorly Dressed and it stirred up quite the conversation on X (previously Twitter) as Kamala's supporters called out the writer's remarks.

After Chitra Ragavan wrote, 'Harris has failed to leverage one of the most powerful communication tools for female leaders: her sense of style,' people flocked to X to describe the article as 'sexist' and 'superficial.'


Chitra explained she felt Kamala's suits were dated and boxy, and that she should instead embrace her heritage with bold colors and intricate jewelry.

View attachment 690393

The When It Mattered podcast host wrote that Kamala 'has been pragmatic and risk-averse in her sartorial choices, filling her wardrobe with the requisite staid pantsuits and dated "pussy bow" blouses.'

The pussy bow was quite popular with former First Lady Hillary Clinton during her presidential campaign, and Kate Middleton is also a fan of the style.

Chitra described Kamala's 'boxy' pantsuits as 'poorly tailored,' and says they 'don’t do justice to her flawless skin, delicate face, and petite figure,' calling for more feminine silhouettes, instead.

Chitra, who works as a leadership coach, also called for Kamala to ditch her penchant for navy blue and instead 'proudly represent America’s modern-day diaspora through subtle nods to her roots in her wardrobe,' by tapping into her Indian and Jamaican roots with 'vibrant colors' or 'intricate jewelry.'

View attachment 690394

www.dailymail.co.uk

Outrage over 'frankly revolting' Kamala Harris article

The Daily Beast released an op-ed on Tuesday that angered people over its 'sexist' statements regarding Vice President Kamala and her fashion choices.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
I think she dresses nicely and with class for a female politician. Better than Hills Mao suits and sone other loon leftists attire.
Cannot even agree with libs in this..
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN, McDad and StarRaider
#51,082
#51,082
evillawyer said:
Yeah, and UT would have some nice victories if you throw out some bad quarters. But that's not how the game is played.

Trump has said he pays for his tax cuts with tariffs. They're a package.

But nice try love. Read more. 😘

"Trump, the Republican nominee, has also called for an end to income tax on tips and Social Security benefits. Overtime pay would also be protected from federal taxes, and the former president recently said he'd consider tax exemptions for public service workers like police officers and firefighters along with members of the military.

The former president said tariffs would compensate for the lost revenue from the tax cuts, but according to CNBC, Trump's tariffs would only raise $3.8 trillion over 10 years, while the income taxes are predicted to generate $33 trillion."
Click to expand...

well that doesn't answer the question.

if tariffs count as raising taxes when what they actually do is raise the cost of goods then we would need to consider energy policy as taxes as well since it can raise costs.

an analysis of tax policy should be tax policy - if one wants to expand that analysis to impact on costs or better yet the spending power of consumers then virtually all policy should be considered in the analysis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, distrovol, hog88 and 2 others
#51,083
#51,083
RockyTop85 said:
The gloating over the presumed reaction to a Trump win is probably accurate, but when I see all the posts acting like this thing is in the bag, compared to most polling averages calling it a total tossup, I can’t help but think we’re going to have another meltdown either way.
Click to expand...

agree it's way to early to call this
 
#51,087
#51,087
RockyTop85 said:
The gloating over the presumed reaction to a Trump win is probably accurate, but when I see all the posts acting like this thing is in the bag, compared to most polling averages calling it a total tossup, I can’t help but think we’re going to have another meltdown either way.
Click to expand...
No more Q Shamans. Hoping for a $hit load of reactions like this.

 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, CagleMtnVol, SpaceCoastVol and 1 other person
#51,088
#51,088
RockyTop85 said:
The gloating over the presumed reaction to a Trump win is probably accurate, but when I see all the posts acting like this thing is in the bag, compared to most polling averages calling it a total tossup, I can’t help but think we’re going to have another meltdown either way.
Click to expand...
Of course you are going to see gloating on this site, tunnel visioned. Somebody is going to be right and somebody is going to be wrong. Regardless of who it is, this thing will carry over until the Deadlines. Neither candidate nor their supporters will walk away from this stating next time.
If it comes down to a toss up race, Trump supporters have done their self an injustice with their posts. Right now I think Trump wins.
 
#51,091
#51,091
VOLS INC. said:
The same libs that attack Trump ferociously for his treatment of women will hug and take pictures will Bill Clinton every chance they get. I’ve seen this among acquaintances of mine. It’s ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Also allowed Harvey Weinstein to be Harvey. Same ones allowed Diddy to be Diddy.
 
#51,094
#51,094
RockyTop85 said:
The gloating over the presumed reaction to a Trump win is probably accurate, but when I see all the posts acting like this thing is in the bag, compared to most polling averages calling it a total tossup, I can’t help but think we’re going to have another meltdown either way.
Click to expand...
Calling it a toss up is to help ratings and keep jobs.
 
#51,095
#51,095
RockyTop85 said:
The gloating over the presumed reaction to a Trump win is probably accurate, but when I see all the posts acting like this thing is in the bag, compared to most polling averages calling it a total tossup, I can’t help but think we’re going to have another meltdown either way.
Click to expand...

It will be very interesting to look back at this cycle's polling. Quinnipiac has Harris +3 in Michigan and tied in Wisconsin today, and Harris polls have been really strong for the last few days in general. Everyone is saying that the pollsters have corrected their methodologies from 2020 and might now be erring in Trump's favor (doubtful), but are we pretending that pollsters didn't try to do the same thing relative to 2016? They were still off then, so why is Biden +9 -> Biden +3 in 2020 turning into Harris +3 -> Harris +4/Harris +5 in 2024?
 
#51,097
#51,097
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and Cod
#51,099
#51,099
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top