2024 Presidential Race

#30,401
#30,401
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Click to expand...

I posted about this earlier today when this video was posted, but I think it got lost (or no one cares)...

at about the 1:50 mark of that video the graphic states that 49% of people ages 18-34 identify as Republican or lean Republican in 2024. It looks like they're citing Pew Research, but that number looks way too high to me and doesn't match what I'm seeing. If that number is even close to accurate, this election will be a landslide. Am I reading the graphic wrong?
 
#30,402
#30,402
LSU-SIU said:
You are trying to make some point, google isn't.

?
Click to expand...
You need to define “involved”. Dred Scott and The Fugitive Slave Act was the “involvement” of the feds in the slave trade by definition. If you’re saying that the feds did not “directly” trade, own, or transport then that is something different.
 
Last edited:
#30,403
#30,403
WoodsmanVol said:
When I post similar evidence about your Trump-Jesus, you summarily dismiss it.Even mock me for it. Why then should I pay attention to your so-called evidence? I figure what's good for the goose, is good for the gander.
Click to expand...

The choice is yours Turbo.

If you want to slob and drag your knuckles instead of looking at empirical evidence that destroys your lies then it's just par for the course of the progressive movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#30,404
#30,404
LouderVol said:
ok, see luther, lg, evil, woodsman, bowl brother, pretty every left leaning member actively defended Biden here for 3.5 years. until they realized it was losing them the race.

Zep is the only one I can't remember and instance of, but he has a separate bromance going on.
Click to expand...
Here, let me help you with a short list of all who actively carried water for Biden in this forum -

Tvolsfan
LawGator
EL
Luther
Clearwater
BowlBrother
Velo
Devo
Turbo
TNRibs
Swampfoxfan
LostSheep
Hunerwadel
Nashvol
Woodsman
MontyPython
Jackrevol
K-Town
Dobbs4Heisman
BerryVol
VolinMichigan
VolTull
BernardKing
SinCityVol
Bnhunt
OHvol40
Ashevolle
SwampfoxVol
RebKell
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol, InVOLuntary, BreatheUT and 9 others
#30,409
#30,409
85SugarVol said:
Here, let me help you with a short list of all who actively carried water for Biden in this forum -

Tvolsfan
LawGator
EL
Luther
Clearwater
BowlBrother
Velo
Devo
Turbo
TNRibs
Swampfoxfan
LostSheep
Hunerwadel
Nashvol
Woodsman
MontyPython
Jackrevol
K-Town
Dobbs4Heisman
BerryVol
VolinMichigan
VolTull
BernardKing
SinCityVol
Bnhunt
OHvol40
Ashevolle
SwampfoxVol
RebKell
Click to expand...
Quite an esteemed list of individuals. Honored to be mentioned among them!!
 
#30,410
#30,410
wtmvol said:
About 1:50 into the video, they show a graphic saying that 49% of those ages 18-34 identify as Republican or lean Republican. It looks like that's coming from Pew Research, but that doesn't match what I'm seeing. And just anecdotally, I don't see how that could possibly be right. Because if even close to 49% of voters under the age of 35 are voting for Trump, the race is over.

Now I definitely see more young people, especially young white males gravitating towards the Republican party. They see Democrats as the party that demonize them based solely on their race and gender. And the draconian COVID lockdowns that for whatever reason were most harshly enforced on young people didn't help. But 49%? I don't buy it.
Click to expand...
There is a massive swing in young white men AND women toward traditionalism. And young, legal, 1st gen immigrants, especially from Latin America, reject all the leftoid ******** out of hand. You'd be surprised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Enki_Amenra
#30,411
#30,411
midnight orange said:
You need to define “involved”. Dred Scott and The Fugitive Slave Act was the “involvement” of the feds in the slave trade by definition. If you’re saying that the feds did not “directly” trade, own, or transport then that is something different.
Click to expand...

There was no "taking" by the United States. Dred Scott has nothing to do with it, you are actually talking about is the absence of the federal government. What I believe you are implying is the U.S. should have been involved in the slave trade. Its the same thing. The United States was not in the business of using, buying, transporting, etc. of slaves as a generalization. I'm sure someone could find some benefit but that even isn't a "taking", or some contract to where a third party was using slaves. I've actually found very little of that even. Literally, the U.S. barely existed as a country and was already stopping the importation of slaves thru legislation.

Regardless, we are all descendants of slaves and we are all descendants of slave owners. Heck, they probably have more slaves in china right now than ever existed in all of time in the United States and Europe, nobody cares. Either way there is no legal, moral, ethical, etc. question here.... there was no taking of any kind by the United States at scale.

Now, if we talk about conscription.... I might not say the same thing. Or say the Japanese Americans in the camps in WWII.
 
#30,412
#30,412
LSU-SIU said:
The United States as far as I know was never involved in the trade, transport, or purchase of slaves. I think I uncovered where there was a contract a third party used slaves to build U.S. ships and that is about it. Now, there could have been something that was on the fringe of benefit if that but even that is suspect. The United States really wasn't involved in slavery in that form, conscription, yup.

The United States even passed Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807, which had an effective 1808 date. The United States actually banned the use of U.S. flagged ships in slave trade in 1794.

If they have a beef its with the companies and people that are long since gone with no recourse, of course, they could all go to the African countries as they were the original slave owners from which they were purchased.

Paying descendants of slave owners for slavery seems fairly strange to me.
Click to expand...
I must be misinterpreting what you are stating. Agree regarding reparations but the trade or sell of salves between plantation owners is constitues IMO that the US allowed the practice to occur. Stii does not change the allocation of money...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#30,414
#30,414
ButchPlz said:
There is a massive swing in young white men AND women toward traditionalism. And young, legal, 1st gen immigrants, especially from Latin America, reject all the leftoid ******** out of hand. You'd be surprised.
Click to expand...
I know it's trending more Republican among young white males. But 49% overall including women? Below is what I got from Pew Research, supposedly the same source as from their graphic. Now this was from August of last year, so things could have changed, but that would be a really drastic shift in 11 months.

PP_2024.4.9_partisan-coalitions_4-03.png
 
#30,416
#30,416
OrangeTsar said:
Sooo………
Do you agree that the quote from Harris W’s legitimate and not „so-called evidence“? You seemed to avoid answering the question just like Cheatle did all day Monday
Click to expand...
We've played this game before, so instead of playing it yet again, I give you:
The wheels on the bus go round and round,
round and round,
round and round.
The wheels on the bus go round and round,
all through the town.
 
#30,420
#30,420
BreatheUT said:
The choice is yours Turbo.

If you want to slob and drag your knuckles instead of looking at empirical evidence that destroys your lies then it's just par for the course of the progressive movement.
Click to expand...
You're speaking to the man in your mirror.
 
#30,425
#30,425
LSU-SIU said:
Well, tell us your real name and address, and we'll see what your skin thickness is.

I'm not sure what else they could do to him, let off a nuke I guess.

What else is there? Not sure if you are serious.
Click to expand...
Yes, I am serious on this one. The claim that Trump has thin skinned is 100% spot on
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top