Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

#6,852
#6,852
kiddiedoc said:
Is it really "screeching" to ask the person in charge how she failed at her job so miserably that people were shot and one died? Oh, and one of the victims is literally one of the most important people in the entire world?
Click to expand...
I think some level of the response she got was due to her own actions after the shooting. not just the events of the shooting itself.

If she had been transparent, offered some sort of actionable plan, maybe even given some conditions to her resignation upon completion of a 3rd party review if deemed necessary.

as far as I have seen she hasn't been cooperative or responsive and that is going to color the reactions that she gets. even in front of the committee, she had nothing, no direct answers.

I also think the real reason both sides are going after her is because they know any protection they have isn't as good as SS, and they are feeling more exposed than previously. puts a little pep in some people's reaction when their butt/ear is on the line too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smallvol#1, Gandalf, ButchPlz and 2 others
#6,854
#6,854
lawgator1 said:
That's perfectly fine.

But to go in and simply fire the top 2-3 levels of supervision, especially right now, is just dumb.
Click to expand...

Its not dumb if they clearly cant do their jobs.....

The people in charge (Cheatle/Mayorkas) couldn't do a risk analysis, staff properly, hire people, retain people, motivate people, communicate. Literally everything they needed to be able to do in that role they couldnt do...
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, Vol since 77, 85SugarVol and 7 others
#6,855
#6,855
kiddiedoc said:
Is it really "screeching" to ask the person in charge how she failed at her job so miserably that people were shot and one died? Oh, and one of the victims is literally one of the most important people in the entire world?
Click to expand...
The screeching was coming from both sides as well. Neither democrats nor republicans feel comfortable with her in control.
 
#6,857
#6,857
OrangeTsar said:
If you were the CEO of a large corporation, would you entrust your own personal safety to someone who, with the full force of the United States government at her command, allowed a 20 year old with a ladder to take several shots at one of the supposedly best protected person on the planet?
Click to expand...
Large corporations aren't entrusting their lives to heads of security. They are typically protecting assets not individuals. At best they develop/implement security protocols under established best practices policy.

She'd find work in no time.

That said she did a horrible job and needed to go. I've said as much repeatedly.
 
#6,858
#6,858
LSU-SIU said:
That's beside the point. They'll have to figure out how to keep things under control, none of this is a shoe-in.
Click to expand...
Well, that’s true. It’s politics. But I don’t know if she can ever overcome her issues. Polls show trump ahead by a wide margin when all candidates are added in.
 
#6,859
#6,859
lawgator1 said:
Nice try. Actually, no. Very, very weak try.

I am not on national TV, nor am I in Congress. Nor am I screeching at the head of an important government agency, as a Congressperson or even an official of any sort.

So now, the comparison effort by you is extremely poor.
Click to expand...

You are a hypocrite. Been proven time and time again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
#6,860
#6,860
KB5252 said:
Large corporations aren't entrusting their lives to heads of security. They are typically protecting assets not individuals. At best they develop/implement security protocols under established best practices policy.

She'd find work in no time.

That said she did a horrible job and needed to go. I've said as much repeatedly.
Click to expand...

I agree with premise but it is kind of like the situation in the movie "Fun with Dick and Jane." She is now national known for her failure and no one is going to risk hiring her due to this taint. Can you imagine having your HR write-up the announcement?
 
#6,861
#6,861
volbound1700 said:
I agree with premise but it is kind of like the situation in the movie "Fun with Dick and Jane." She is now national known for her failure and no one is going to risk hiring her due to this taint. Can you imagine having your HR write-up the announcement?
Click to expand...

Some left leaning company is probably funding her next gig...
 
#6,862
#6,862
volbound1700 said:
I agree with premise but it is kind of like the situation in the movie "Fun with Dick and Jane." She is now national known for her failure and no one is going to risk hiring her due to this taint. Can you imagine having your HR write-up the announcement?
Click to expand...
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILVFL
#6,864
#6,864
volbound1700 said:
I agree with premise but it is kind of like the situation in the movie "Fun with Dick and Jane." She is now national known for her failure and no one is going to risk hiring her due to this taint. Can you imagine having your HR write-up the announcement?
Click to expand...
Yes. I saw this.

Yes. I giggled.

Yes. I am juvenile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, volbound1700 and 85SugarVol
#6,865
#6,865
kiddiedoc said:
Is it really "screeching" to ask the person in charge how she failed at her job so miserably that people were shot and one died? Oh, and one of the victims is literally one of the most important people in the entire world?
Click to expand...


Did you watch her?

She'd ask a question and when Cheatle said she'd have to check, she'd shreek and change the answer given, "That's a no!" followed by the insulting and profane language.

Mace ought to be required to publicly apologize to Cheatle and her district should be ashamed of her cheap theatrics.
 
#6,866
#6,866
lawgator1 said:
Did you watch her?

She'd ask a question and when Cheatle said she'd have to check, she'd shreek and change the answer given, "That's a no!" followed by the insulting and profane language.

Mace ought to be required to publicly apologize to Cheatle and her district should be ashamed of her cheap theatrics.
Click to expand...

And Trump should apologize as well to the AG, DOJ, FBI, etc that he wasted so much of their time by them trying to overthrow a candidate elect and a sitting President with all this Russia Gate, Lawfare, J6, Pee gate, etc Damn him.

He could have just not run for President and saved everyone the time. He should also apologize to the shooter as Trump hit the bullet with his ear i.e. destruction of private property.
 
#6,868
#6,868
Voltrapnbama said:
Well, that’s true. It’s politics. But I don’t know if she can ever overcome her issues. Polls show trump ahead by a wide margin when all candidates are added in.
Click to expand...

Hm. This has barely started, they will use whatever tools they have available legal, illegal, immoral, evil, etc.

Harris is the one that should be worried her numbers aren't so great and they'll have to do something about that whole thing.
 
#6,871
#6,871
Can Cheatle be held in contempt of Congress and jailed for refusing to answer questions yesterday? Seems to me she’s getting off too easy by just quitting.
 
#6,872
#6,872
LSU-SIU said:
Hm. This has barely started, they will use whatever tools they have available legal, illegal, immoral, evil, etc.

Harris is the one that should be worried her numbers aren't so great and they'll have to do something about that whole thing.
Click to expand...
I can agree to that. I don’t trust the “system” at all. They are pure evil
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#6,873
#6,873
walkenvol said:
Can Cheatle be held in contempt of Congress and jailed for refusing to answer questions yesterday? Seems to me she’s getting off too easy by just quitting.
Click to expand...
She didn’t really refuse to answer. She just didn’t answer.. lol also, there is a right to not self incriminate.
 
#6,875
#6,875
Voltrapnbama said:
She didn’t really refuse to answer. She just didn’t answer.. lol also, there is a right to not self incriminate.
Click to expand...
Cheatle admitted to one of the last congresswomen that she had received information from the FBI concerning the number of casings found on the rooftop then refused to share it. How is that not refusing?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top