Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

I agree that the bullet pictured whizzing by Trump couldn't have come from the water tower. But the shot that took out two bystanders and hit the handrail couldn't have come from crooks. It's a big confusing mess, but it looks like there must've been 2 shooters at least. There's no other way to explain those two guys (not in line with crooks) dropping at the same time.
 
Well what can I say I am that conspiracy theorists who warns of looney things..... like harmful MRNA technology in a "vaccine" that could proove to be medically unsound. I can't claim the balanced, calabrated, and even keeled thinking of the triple boosted here.
 
I agree that the bullet pictured whizzing by Trump couldn't have come from the water tower. But the shot that took out two bystanders and hit the handrail couldn't have come from crooks. It's a big confusing mess, but it looks like there must've been 2 shooters at least. There's no other way to explain those two guys (not in line with crooks) dropping at the same time.
The video I referenced explains that really well, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
I agree that the bullet pictured whizzing by Trump couldn't have come from the water tower. But the shot that took out two bystanders and hit the handrail couldn't have come from crooks. It's a big confusing mess, but it looks like there must've been 2 shooters at least. There's no other way to explain those two guys (not in line with crooks) dropping at the same time.
And this is my only real point..not so much claiming what did happen, but just what in the narrative isn't adding up, and therefore needs a closer look. I won't claim to know where another shooter was or is. Just that Crooks can't be responsible for all the trajectories that day, and therefore someone has some explaining to do......and audio analysis backs that up.
 
Well what can I say I am that conspiracy theorists who warns of looney things..... like harmful MRNA technology in a "vaccine" that could proove to be medically unsound. I can't claim the balanced, calabrated, and even keeled thinking of the triple boosted here.
For me, not putting my faith in a big government/ big pharma collaboration of rushed to market vaccine didnt seem conspiratorial.

It seemed prudent.

We are thankful we declined, too.
 
For the people saying there is no second shooter...your starting to look as crazy as those saying it's staged......did Crooks bullets curve in mid air? Trump was looking at this screen...a bullet hitting his ear parralel is not possible from crooks, in fact a view of his ear is not possible from crooks atm. that the bullet was parralel is irrefutable from slow motion video and his actual wound.

View attachment 660213
Oh no, second shooters and magic bullets. Where have I heard these terms before 🤔
 
I haven't been following that closely. What video are you referring to?
It was posted earlier. I think in this thread. I dunno because it all jumbles together.

The lady seemed Asian/ Asian-ish. It had graphics interlaced with footage.

I'll see if I can find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I don't know the exact angle there....and the tower is over twice the distance....

What I do know is for Crooks bullet to hit his ear it would have had to go through his head. That is hard to dismiss.

I saw something (forgot who posted it) that showed the slow motion impact and angle into Trump's ear that would generally align with the angle from where Crooks was.


That destroys the "shard of glass theory" though....

Ive seen nothing that shows the first shot didnt come from that roof. It was roughly based on audio 400 feet away at a similar height to Trump's head. The only thing that meets that desctiption is that roof...

A lot of other questions need to be answered for sure
 
I haven't been following that closely. What video are you referring to?
Here it is. LSU posted it in another thread.


Good video showing how the bullets made their impact and it was actually a fairly tight target area. Not horrible for just a red dot at that range, on a metal roof with no rest, with police harassing, etc. This doesn't mean there couldn't have been another shooter but shows that one shooter from that location could have hit those targets.
 
For me, not putting my faith in a big government/ big pharma collaboration of rushed to market vaccine didnt seem conspiratorial.

It seemed prudent.

We are thankful we declined, too.
Well I am only asking that you take that same sane and rational thinking and really look at the arial photos, and and teh sound analysis again, before dissmissing them, however much I may irritate you, simply look at them again.

It doesn't take alot of time to realize the narrative told doesn't match the video or the maps.
 
Here it is. LSU posted it in another thread.
That is a 3d model video though, and I can't help but notice it doesn't line up with the arial picture.

GS4KPdpasAUBlXm.jpg

Later Add:....since I guess I wasn't clear, I am looking only at the sightline from crooks to Trump the other lines are by the guy that made this graphic, and not any conclusion or theory of mine.
 
Last edited:
Well I am only asking that you take that same sane and rational thinking and really look at the arial photos, and and teh sound analysis again, before dissmissing them, however much I may irritate you, simply look at them again.

It doesn't take alot of time to realize the narrative told doesn't match the video or the maps.
But the multiple shooter analysisesses don't interest me. I only watched the other video because it had a headline that was neutral. The one's with "Watertower shooter proven" or similar makes my eyes glaze over.
If you're proven right and it leads to a 2nd shooter arrested, I'll be the first to sing your praises. Guaranteed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntar heel
Here it is. LSU posted it in another thread.
She isn't answering to the fact that the two people hit on the same bleacher were not standing next to each other. They were almost on opposite ends of the top row. Watch the footage again and pay attention to the two blue circled areas. Firefighter guy falls simultaneously as the handrail guy gets hit. Those guys do not align with Crooks.
1000005006.jpg
1000005007.jpg
 
While there is no way a single bullet would bounce and hit multiple people that far apart, what if, hear me out, the shooter shot more than 1 bullet? 🤯
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeTsar
She isn't answering to the fact that the two people hit on the same bleacher were not standing next to each other. They were almost on opposite ends of the top row. Watch the footage again and pay attention to the two blue circled areas. Firefighter guy falls simultaneously as the handrail guy gets hit. Those guys do not align with Crooks.
View attachment 660227
View attachment 660228
I thought she addressed the other mutiple bullets...believe she said 7 or 8. I don't know if all hit the hydraulic lift to the side of the stands though.
Anyway. It's cool. I'm just sharing my thoughts. I don't have a persuasive angle on any of this. Yall are perfectly capable of coming to whatever conclusion makes sense to you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
That's because you elected a dementia patient for a President that really hasn't even briefed the American people, nor have they really clarified anything of value or even asked anyone for assistance.

Nutjob.

Why are they leaking stuff and briefing stuff behind closed doors?

You = electoral college
 
Advertisement

Back
Top