Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

#6,202
#6,202
DinkinFlicka said:
So you're going to make that call for other parents?

Does it take a village, jmac? Does it?
Click to expand...
Other parents can make their own call and I will make my call on it and my call is no teacher should be posting about wanting the murder of another person. Other parents should be concerned too, if other parents are not concerned then those are the kind of parents I would not want around my kid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smallvol#1
#6,207
#6,207
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
No it doesn't watch the video. He addresses that as well. There are three distinct different weapons.
Click to expand...

Never said other wise. There were two counter sniper teams, both shot. We can only see the one counter sniper shoot, but there could be actually up to 4 different weapon sounds.

From what I was told the other team was clear on the other side of the stands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#6,210
#6,210
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:


They are and have always been a 3 letter agency company.
Click to expand...


thats-true-kramer.gif


Yeah, its still coming up in the Seth Rich case about CrowdStrike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Sgt_Nick_Fury
#6,215
#6,215
LSU-SIU said:
That seems very plausible and kind of goes with the 2nd sniper team being on that side of the stands by those other buildings.
Click to expand...
The 14:00 mark was interesting. Crooks shot from a roof DOWN toward Trump, nicked Trumps ear so the bullet should have a downward trajectory. Yet the bullet then hits a guy sitting atop the bleachers above Trump's level which suggests a upward trajectory. So his theory is the shot did not come from the roof of the building but from inside the building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Enki_Amenra, 825VOL and 1 other person
#6,216
#6,216
jmacvols1 said:
The 14:00 mark was interesting. Crooks shot from a roof DOWN toward Trump, nicked Trumps ear so the bullet should have a downward trajectory. Yet the bullet then hits a guy sitting atop the bleachers above Trump's level which suggests a upward trajectory. So his theory is the first shot did not come from the roof of the building but from inside the building.
Click to expand...
Did he though?

 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#6,217
#6,217
jmacvols1 said:
The 14:00 mark was interesting. Crooks shot from a roof DOWN toward Trump, nicked Trumps ear so the bullet should have a downward trajectory. Yet the bullet then hits a guy sitting atop the bleachers above Trump's level which suggests a upward trajectory. So his theory is the shot did not come from the roof of the building but from inside the building.
Click to expand...
Look at the video I posted. That may help. Also, I am not 100% sure that the other counter sniper team didn't actually take the firefighter out. As far as I know they were way by the buildings on the other side.

????
 
#6,218
#6,218
LSU-SIU said:
Never said other wise. There were two counter sniper teams, both shot. We can only see the one counter sniper shoot, but there could be actually up to 4 different weapon sounds.

From what I was told the other team was clear on the other side of the stands.
Click to expand...

That is correct. The police sniper teams to the right of where Trump wqs facing and closest to the sniper's building (the ones in the iconic photos from Saturday) shot (and missed). The sniper team to the left of where Trump was facing was the 9th shot and thats who took out out the sniper...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#6,220
#6,220
Cullen is 100% wrong. No way the bullet caught on camera came from a spot a few hundred feet in the air.

I dont think Martenson is right (2 sets of counter snipers plus gunman makes 3) but at least his argument doesnt violate 6th grade geometry...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlipKidVol and McDad
#6,221
#6,221
BigOrangeMojo said:
Cullen is 100% wrong. No way the bullet caught on camera came from a spot a few hundred feet in the air.

I dont think Martenson is right (2 sets of counter snipers plus gunman makes 3) but at least his argument doesnt violate 6th grade geometry...
Click to expand...
I dunno but as I had not heard of him before I went back and watched some of his videos on vegas a topic rather close to my heart as a result of events that happened that day to yours truly as well. He has some pretty interesting footage and theories. Not to say he is a slam dunk, but he deffinately is a guy who does extensive homework....

I know I have heard several people mentioning SS mentioning that trajectory of bullet that hit spectator seemed to be from more then twice the distance as Crooks...I have yet to find actual SS stating that though....
 
#6,222
#6,222
volinbham said:
A problem with Cheatle doing a public hearing is the stupid grandstanding that R congressional members will engage in rather than digging into the most important questions.

At this point I'd like her to meet privately under oath with the various Senate and House committees and let the information of her testimony come out rather than watch the stupid display we'll see in a public setting.

The public one can come later
Click to expand...
I agree. If they want to get a real deep dive into that day's events and how they transpired the way to do it is her speaking to a few people in a quiet environment with little interruption.

Not each member of congress asking their own questions for 5 min each.
 
#6,223
#6,223
volinbham said:
A problem with Cheatle doing a public hearing is the stupid grandstanding that R congressional members will engage in rather than digging into the most important questions.

At this point I'd like her to meet privately under oath with the various Senate and House committees and let the information of her testimony come out rather than watch the stupid display we'll see in a public setting.

The public one can come later
Click to expand...
And that’s why all those public hearings are a waste of time.
 
#6,224
#6,224
BigOrangeMojo said:
Cullen is 100% wrong. No way the bullet caught on camera came from a spot a few hundred feet in the air.

I dont think Martenson is right (2 sets of counter snipers plus gunman makes 3) but at least his argument doesnt violate 6th grade geometry...
Click to expand...
I disagree with the premise of multiple shooters, too.
There was a video posted earlier that explained the trajectory and where the bullets hit earlier.

Dont know what the young lady who made it does for a living but the video was well done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188, BigOrangeMojo and LSU-SIU
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top