Majors
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 21,799
- Likes
- 36,291
That's the one that I posted. I am so sorry that I ruffled all the dim feathers and the resident alien expert by saying bullet. I assumed intelligence which was a MAJOR faux pas on my part.The one i have seen caught the vapor trail of the bullet passing through the air.
To catch the bullet in a single frame would be virtually impossible.
The problem is that we've allowed ourselves to be divided into sides in the first place. We've been conditioned and herded into separate camps and pitted against one another. House divided.
I'm just curious, immediately last night people on the left started claiming it was a disgruntled trump supporter, or trump set it up for attention. Why only complain about one side, and their conspiracies?Stand by. Very likely, a Rightoid will post a fake truth about the shooter being a President Volodymyr Zelenskyy agent in an effort to secure and retain war funding. The Masters of theUniverseConspiracy will strike again.
Don't think there is any doubt he was crazy.mmnow the reason is why??? Would you agree or disagree that a young person who is anti trump (biggest cult alive) would be influenced by rhetoric that he is Hitler and a threat to democracy?? Which has been the DNC talking point since 2016..To be clear, by "OK huff," you mean you don't think there is a good chance this person is crazy?
I'm curious. What makes you think I have control over what other people think and say? Is this another Trumper smear post, making it seem I said something I didn't even think about, let alone say?I'm just curious, immediately last night people on the left started claiming it was a disgruntled trump supporter, or trump set it up for attention. Why only complain about one side, and their conspiracies?
You doubt that, yet blame Trump for "January 6th". Can't be both ways bud, either people are responsible for their own actions, or not. It doesn't work only when it fits your narrative.
I'm curious. What makes you think I have control over what other people think and say? Is this another Trumper smear post, making it seem I said something I didn't even think about, let alone say?
Obviously he couldn't for official acts...no GOP member has said different...but acts as VP are not covered for prosecution...they could get him there is a money trail..but its not worth the time..odds are Joe will pass before anything significant happens..and once Joe goes..Hunter will matter even less.This guy, Rep. Mike Collins, was also delighted by the Supreme Court's immunity ruling, because it could prove to be of benefit to Trump.
It begs a serious question here :
Do Republicans think that immunity will only apply to Republican Presidents?
The court ruled that certain core Presidential duties are completely protected, while other so-called official acts are presumed to be subject to immunity too. Only unofficial acts are not subject to any immunity. In the aftermath of that ruling, I don't see how one can argue that Biden can be prosecuted .... and you only have the conservative Supreme Court Justices to blame for that.
Well, let's see...
1/6 Trump gave a fiery speech and defied the election results urging his followers to go to the Capitol, which they immediately did, bringing violence, death, and chaos with them.
VERSUS
You assume at this point, with zero information, that the shooter was motivated by some comment Biden made at some point, in the past.
They simply aren't comparable at this point in time. Not that you care.
I think we can pretty much all agree that this was a massive blunder by the secret service. A lot of people on the right are going to go conspiratorial and think this was deliberately allowed by the Biden administration. Until indicated otherwise, I'm going to assume this was pure incompetence at the highest level.
How do they fail to secure that location? How do people that incompetent (if it is indeed incompetence) end up on a candidate’s detail? At what point do you start to consider maybe just maybe this was an inside job?I said last night and say again I agree.
But there's an enormous difference between saying that the SS screwed up in not securing the building versus saying there was an intentional failure, either by that SS team or by the govt in providing SS protection.
The former I think is evident. The latter is trying to exploit this event for yet more political divide, which isn't what we need right now.
Can't believe this kid was only 20. Crazy
Could the SS or Police not get a judge to provide them temporary access during the event? Private property rights don’t seem so cut and dry to me in this instance, but I’m no lawyer and didn’t sleep at a holiday inn last night.Yes it does. (I don't know the status of the building btw) If the owner doesn't give them access than that's that.
On the ground might have worked but probably would have been tough to get him from down below quickly. The only quick way in that situation was a sniper with a little height to help.
We were set up as a republic for this very reason- to naturally limit the damage of division. The issue is the left wants everything democratized, which is just going to bring mob rule and chaos.True but that started with Jefferson and Hamilton in Washington's tenure on Day 1. In fact all Democracies/Republics seem to have this problem.