Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

#1,751
#1,751
LadyVolette said:
the BBC interview, I was like what the heck lol., you have to wonder if an American network had interviewed him, would we have even seen it? He said he and his friends kept pointing over there and they (police and SS) were just ignoring him? So weird. But, I am going to err on the side of incompetence.. but my husband thinks they have him the chance to get one good shot off and then shoot him.. but he’s more cynical than me.. like they knew he was going to be there and the guy pointing it out kind of foiled it., his theory, not mine.. his words ‘that dude’s gonna get Clintoned’
Click to expand...
After reading the “anomalies” wrt security detail in this thread and knowing the lies that have been perpetrated against the American public time and time again, one could easily understand why your hubs would be cynical. Can’t say his theory hasn’t crossed my mind in all of this. I just hope that’s not who we are, but after Covid and so many other “agendas”, I’m just about equally cynical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adam.vol and tbh
#1,752
#1,752
BowlBrother85 said:
The vast majority of statements regarding this incident from the right do not concern well-wishes to Trump or condolences to the families of the deceased. They are celebratory in nature, regarding how it will supposedly give Trump's campaign a boost. It's weird.
Click to expand...

My first statement in the Endzone did that. But something felt off. And, let's be honest. Something is off. The nearest building that's a Joe Milton orange throw away is somehow out of SS security perimeter..

The buck stops with those in charge. Myorkas has consistently denied more SS resources for DJT. Would have more resources stretched perimeter to 150 or 200 yards?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, 85SugarVol, NorthDallas40 and 4 others
#1,753
#1,753
@BowlBrother85 - Yesterday was a monumental failure for the Secret Service. Period. A guy had multiple clear shots at 130-140 yards. A moderate shooter blows Trumps head off at that range.

Every security expert has questioned the small perimeter, the venue planning, and many have questioned the resources dedicated. Resources have been asked for and denied.

The question is why? Why was the perimeter small? Why were high points not secure? Was there enough resources?

Until I see something to the contrary, it's going to be a willful neglect by the Biden admin to provide enough resources to adequately protect a political rival. The speeches from law enforcement to date have given me no reason to doubt that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, TN-POSSUM, Smallvol#1 and 9 others
#1,754
#1,754
BowlBrother85 said:
The vast majority of statements regarding this incident from the right do not concern well-wishes to Trump or condolences to the families of the deceased. They are celebratory in nature, regarding how it will supposedly give Trump's campaign a boost. It's weird.
Click to expand...
And it seems much of the left are upset because the shooter missed. And ones like you are hoping so bad that Trump may have mistaken a bullet for some glass instead of worrying about the families involved or Trump. It’s not weird but sad and pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, TN-POSSUM, Smallvol#1 and 10 others
#1,760
#1,760
zeppelin128 said:
If this was Biden instead of Trump, people would be celebrating it on social media, too. Most social media is a toxic cesspit of loudmouth assholes.
Click to expand...
The attempt is being celebrated, and the failure is being lamented. You'll see lots of social media accounts "go private" or the old "I've been hacked!" excuse become rampant over the next few days.

I wonder who the first celeb to say they got hacked will be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, walkenvol, volbound1700 and 2 others
#1,761
#1,761
LadyVolette said:
the BBC interview, I was like what the heck lol., you have to wonder if an American network had interviewed him, would we have even seen it? He said he and his friends kept pointing over there and they (police and SS) were just ignoring him? So weird. But, I am going to err on the side of incompetence.. but my husband thinks they have him the chance to get one good shot off and then shoot him.. but he’s more cynical than me.. like they knew he was going to be there and the guy pointing it out kind of foiled it., his theory, not mine.. his words ‘that dude’s gonna get Clintoned’
Click to expand...
I have thought the same. That guy interviewed by the BBC may have a short life expectancy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1 and StarRaider
#1,763
#1,763
The Patriot Voice
@TPV_John


Now, it’s being reported that Thomas Matthew Crooks is NOT the alleged shooter, and that it is a guy affiliated with ANTIFA that was actually arrested back in 2016 for being involved in an Anti-Trump protest in Pittsburgh. 🚨🚨🚨

His name is Maxwell Yearick.

He was sentenced to a 3-12 month jail sentence in Allegheny County Jail.

I don’t know WHO is the true shooter at this point, and it seems like we are being intentionally confused about it.

We know they are going to WIPE this persons ENTIRE history on the internet, so we may never know.

Side note, Maxwell had viable gauges in his ears in his mug, now they are closed up.

As an American citizen, I am calling on the FBI, DHS & DOJ to designate ANTIFA AS A DOMESTIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION & OPEN UP AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION into the attempted assassination on President
@realDonaldTrump
.

IMMEDIATELY.

To NOT do so, would be to be COMPLICIT in these heinous actions.

I doubt they will, but WE SHOULD DEMAND IT.

wtae.com

Lock them up: Judge sends Pittsburgh Trump protesters to jail

Two Pittsburgh men are sentenced to jail after an altercation with police during a campaign appearance by Donald Trump at the convention center.
wtae.com wtae.com

EDIT to this post:

FoxLive is reporting that FBI identifies shooter as Thomas Matthews Crooks
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, StarRaider and Enki_Amenra
#1,764
#1,764
Supposedly the bullet captured on photo by a NYT journalist

k58q4nsg2ecd1.png
 
#1,765
#1,765
The shooter was a 20 year old male that at one time was registered to vote Republican. He used an AR-style weapon.

I’ll wager that the Secret Service/Law Enforcement snipers weren’t firing .223.
 
#1,768
#1,768
Tin Man said:
The shooter was a 20 year old male that at one time was registered to vote Republican. He used an AR-style weapon.

I’ll wager that the Secret Service/Law Enforcement snipers weren’t firing .223.
Click to expand...
That is not accurate. . . I mean, he's not the shooter based on new reports.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top