85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 35,688
- Likes
- 71,730
I get what you’re saying, but in the short term snapshot the border was being addressed with a remain in Mexico policy and barriers/walls to mitigate unfettered illegal entry in the last administration. It should have been addressed long ago aside from just deportations and a shrugActually, he has a point. Others in the past, I think as far back as the Reagan era, called for fencing off the border. Politicaliars on both sides objected in favor of open border to facilitate trade. They actually had a name for that, but I don't recall what it was. I do remember arguments if we did that we should also fence off our border with Canada. Just the same, the border mess existed long before Biden became President. Further, I think Trump's idea was/is what we need. But he was undermined by the type of leeches he attracts and hangs around with. Steve Bannon, Brian Kolfage, and Andrew Badolato who fraudulently
stole money meant for the wall. Further, if you look back, you will see from 1964, Presidents of both parties had a chance to get a wall done. They either didn't under some pretext or another, or instituted timid ineffective actions, like temporary border closings. Biden? He stupidly, well, really to court Hispanic votes, continued the trend of doing nothing, except hindering Texas. Trump, at least, did try to do something. Might have if he hadn't trusted his greedy leeches, assuming he was not in cahoots with the money diversions into their own pockets. Which is possible as his sleaze is well-known.
Splitting hairs and using “percentages” to support your bias. You refuse to look at it in the totality because you know what it reveals. So, you deflect by invoking an “academic” approach and overthinking what is very simple to understand.Not as a percentage.
What some of you guys are doing is like this............
There were more accidents, deaths, and property damage on interstates over the summer than there were at this one rural intersection which only has an average of 5 accidents and 2 deaths per day.
So the conclusion has to be that interstates are more dangerous than this particular intersection....
I trust everyone can see the nonsense in that position.
Nonsense.Splitting hairs and using “percentages” to support your bias. You refuse to look at it in the totality because you know what it reveals. So, you deflect by invoking an “academic” approach and overthinking what is very simple to understand.
Virtually no one who has known the gangster or worked with him likes him or think he should ever come close top public office again. Almost all say he'd be a grave danger to the country.....Yet the Earls still like him...Hmmm: Very curious.
What would y'all do if Trump wins and within his first 100 days prices started trending down along with inflation and everything else???
Breaking windows, attacking cops, armed members in combat gear and single file forcing their way into the Capitol. Taking and destroying equipment of the media recording the event, shouting their desire to hang the vice President, yelling for Nancy P. so they found and assault her. And after the event, lie, lie, lie about it being peaceful and not a coup attempting riot.Were the Jan 6th protestors mostly peaceful?
There were more 1/6 protesters that never entered the Capitol or had confrontations with law enforcement. So, by your using “percentages” as the gold standard to determine level of severity…you tell me. Did BLM write checks to help rebuild the minority owned businesses and others their participants destroyed to the tune of $2+ billion, or did they just look the other way?? I mean, we can do this all day. Yes, the ones that entered the Capitol and were destructive should have been arrested and gone to jail. They have.Were the Jan 6th protestors mostly peaceful?
