hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 119,760
- Likes
- 176,002
LOLYou're making a error in asking BB85 questions about comprehension. Lemme 'splain:
You know how in pop culture a bull sees red and just loses his temper? Like nothing matters after that moment when red has entered its field of vision?
That's BB85. Instead of the color red, his trigger is anything Trump. The written name, a picture, his initials, and any "scandal" associated with him over his lifetime. Once these enter BB85's field of vision, nothing but rage exists in his system. His brain shuts down. Only hyper-emotional apoplexy is accessible. Many times I've wondered if he's foaming at mouth while typing posts.
In the absence of this 'red cape', BB85 can form sentences, be cordial, and even be insightful. He will occasionally even admit some Ds are not good for the country. These are the only times you can ask about comprehension, have an actual dialogue, and even exchange a joke or two.
I hope this helps you. To be frank, had BB85 not accused other of being in a cult I would have worried he was in one considering his behaviors.
Didn't Hyper-Emotional Apoplexy open for Black Flag on one tour?You're making a error in asking BB85 questions about comprehension. Lemme 'splain:
You know how in pop culture a bull sees red and just loses his temper? Like nothing matters after that moment when red has entered its field of vision?
That's BB85. Instead of the color red, his trigger is anything Trump. The written name, a picture, his initials, and any "scandal" associated with him over his lifetime. Once these enter BB85's field of vision, nothing but rage exists in his system. His brain shuts down. Only hyper-emotional apoplexy is accessible. Many times I've wondered if he's foaming at mouth while typing posts.
In the absence of this 'red cape', BB85 can form sentences, be cordial, and even be insightful. He will occasionally even admit some Ds are not good for the country. These are the only times you can ask about comprehension, have an actual dialogue, and even exchange a joke or two.
I hope this helps you. To be frank, had BB85 not accused other of being in a cult I would have worried he was in one considering his behaviors.
The way things are going it’s possible that in 15 years, Trump vs Biden will be looked back upon as a clash of debonair, intellectual heavyweights.I still can't believe this election is going to be a Trump vs Biden rematch. We can do better.
Or can we?
Nothing short of being chaotic riots and buildings being burned to the ground knowing the Dems. You can bet Antifa/BLM will be making their presents known for days. History from 1968 raises it's ugly head again w/different named hate groups showing up to participate.The DNC otta be a real **** show
MO, she would be a shoo-in even in a completely fair election. Newsom will need a ton of "help"
I was thinking the same thing until Newsom put out that national level abortion ad.
He's Governor of California. Why should he give a damn what Alabama does?
Unless he's trying to get national level attention...
So, I'm thinking he's subtly tossing his hat in the ring.
He is within the margin of error in almost every poll .... and it is anything but a given that he is going to be replaced. For anyone else to be the nominee of the Democratic Party, Biden would have to decline the nomination. There is not a process in which he can be "replaced" involuntarily.That seems to be a given, at this point. Even MSM is now reporting polls showing Brandon way behind.
He is within the margin of error in almost every poll .... and it is anything but a given that he is going to be replaced. For anyone else to be the nominee of the Democratic Party, Biden would have to decline the nomination. There is not a process in which he can be "replaced" involuntarily.
Or ....Then one of two things...
1. He'll decline the nomination and "suggest" a replacement. Either Michelle Obama as Hog thinks or Gavin Newsom. He sure as hell isn't going to nominate Mamala Kamala. She will get trounced at the polls in the largest victory since Reagan 1984. Newsom or Obama give them a fighting chance. Of the two, Obama takes the election handily.
Or...
2. The Democrats feel confident enough in their ability to cheat their way into the White House again and he moves forward as the nominee. Even with MOE polling (which is dubious at best) Biden is losing ground fast. He's not inspiring, he has no message other than "I'm not Trump" which is not resonating with voters and he's losing the centrist vote fast due to his failed economy.
He won't make it another four years. Democrats also know Kamala isn't the future. If she takes over and continues this spiral into economic ruin, they will get hammered in the mid terms and in 2028.
It wasn't a fair election. 2020 was rigged with massive institutions being levied against him. I don't buy it was stolen but I don't see how anyone can honestly argue against rigged.Or ....
3. Biden will a fair election election just as he did in 2020. There is no "again," because there is no evidence to support the contention that the 2020 election results were anything but legitimate.
It wasn't a fair election. 2020 was rigged with massive institutions being levied against him. I don't buy it was stolen but I don't see how anyone can honestly argue against rigged.
That's a ridiculous argument ... and when Trump says that it was "rigged," he is obviously talking about votes having been changed from him to Biden. It wasn't rigged. An unpopular President lost a free and fair election.It wasn't a fair election. 2020 was rigged with massive institutions being levied against him. I don't buy it was stolen but I don't see how anyone can honestly argue against rigged.
There was in-depth audit performed by a partisan firm, called the "Cyber Ninjas" in Maricopa County, Arizona .... and it yielded a gain in votes for Biden. There were audits performed all over the country, in fact. There can be anomalies pointed to in every election, but they don't serve as proof of fraud. You are just wrong. The 2020 election is the most heavily scrutinized in American history.I'll disagree on the stolen part. I do think Ann in depth audit would have uncovered significant irregularities.
But the rest of your post was spot on.