2024 Presidential Race

[utvolpj]

Supply chain disruptions were also a big factor. It was a perfect storm of things.

Which were absolutely exacerbated by the Biden admins refusal to use alternate ports. Coincidentally those ports were in FL and non-union but I'm sure politics wouldn't get in the way of helping the country. No, it was better to allow ships to sit for weeks so that a union worker could unload them between breaks

 

[midnight orange]

Listen to your stupid logic :

You can't trust Mike Pompeo .... so, you will just trust Vladimir Putin instead? Think about that for a second.

.... and Mike Pompeo was Donald Trump's own hand-picked Secretary of State. Hell yes, he should trust him over the denial of an authoritarian ruler.

I don't want you to say that there is collusion between Trump and Russia. I simply want an explanation for why Trump would side with Vladimir Putin over his own Secretary of State? That was ridiculous and poor leadership.

You‘re not this stupid. I don’t trust Trump, Pompeo or Putin. Wise up.

 

[Sea Ray]

That is ridiculous. If the point was simply to insist that NATO members pay their membership fees, that can be done without making threats or mentioning Russia.

Trump simply did not have to say that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want," to a strategic American ally, following a hypothetical invasion, simply because of delinquent fees. That was impulsive and irrational of Trump.

Trump is not a wordsmith. Nor is he politically correct but I get what he’s trying to say here

 

[BowlBrother85]

You‘re not this stupid. I don’t trust Trump, Pompeo or Putin. Wise up.

Still waiting for that explanation ...

Why did Trump side with Putin over his own Secretary of State?

It wasn't because of any form of collusion. Fine.

But why then?

What is the point of even having a Secretary of State, if you are going to side with the word of an authoritarian ruler over your Secretary of State?

 

[midnight orange]

Still waiting for that explanation ...

Why did Trump side with Putin over his own Secretary of State?

It wasn't because of any form of collusion. Fine.

But why then?

What is the point of even having a Secretary of State, if you are going to side with the word of an authoritarian ruler over your Secretary of State?

Your going to be waiting for a long time because a) I don’t really care and b) there is no amount of evidence that can convince someone deluded with TDS.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Trump is not a wordsmith. Nor is he politically correct but I get what he’s trying to say here

I do too .... and words matter when you are the President of the United States.

Donald Trump said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want," to a fellow NATO member, following a hypothetical invasion, simply due to unpaid NATO membership fees.

^^^^ In fact, that was exactly what he did, and I have video to prove it. ^^^^

Donald Trump has been given chances to amend his rhetoric from that speech in South Carolina, and he has declined to do so. What else is there to infer at this point .... except that Trump meant everything he said?

 

[BowlBrother85]

Your going to be waiting for a long time because a) I don’t really care and b) there is no amount of evidence that can convince someone deluded with TDS.

There it is yet again. You admit that you can't explain it, but still, the problem is always with the person who wants the explanation. LOL.

It's a very reasonable question :

Why did Donald Trump side with Putin over his own Secretary of State?

The sad aspect of this, is not that you don't know .... it's that you don't want to know.

 

[whodeycin85]

This is always the only thing the MAGA crowd has to contribute. It's old, stupid, tired, and boring .... and in perpetual denial of what Trump has said and done regarding Russia.

..... but then again, old, stupid, tired and boring pretty much sums up the MAGA crowd, anyway.

What moves did Russia make during Trumps presidency?

 

[Sea Ray]

I do too .... and words matter when you are the President of the United States.

Donald Trump said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want," to a fellow NATO member, following a hypothetical invasion, simply due to unpaid NATO membership fees.

^^^^ In fact, that was exactly what he did, and I have video to prove it. ^^^^

Donald Trump has been given chances to amend his rhetoric from that speech in South Carolina, and he has declined to do so. What else is there to infer at this point .... except that Trump meant everything he said?

He meant pay your dues and I support that message

 

[midnight orange]

There it is yet again. You admit that you can't explain it, but still, the problem is always with the person who wants the explanation. LOL.

It's a very reasonable question :

Why did Donald Trump side with Putin over his own Secretary of State?

The sad aspect of this, is not that you don't know .... it's that you don't want to know.

If the shoe fits….Have a great day!

 

[BowlBrother85]

He meant pay your dues and I support that message

He could have just said that and left it alone .... but he didn't.

The problem is that Trump said much more than that. He said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want," to a NATO member who was delinquent on their fees. That was irresponsible and reckless.

 

[BowlBrother85]

If the shoe fits….Have a great day!

LOL. PATHETIC.

 

[midnight orange]

LOL. PATHETIC.

okay

 

[BowlBrother85]

What moves did Russia make during Trumps presidency?

I have already discussed the SolarWinds breach many times .... Trump sided with Russia over his own Secretary of State.

Why did he do that?

.... and don't say that the SolarWinds breach was insignificant. I can blow that up in a minute. It was a big deal, and a direct attack on American cyber-infrastructure.

 

[luthervol]

So should the Covid shot have been mandated?

Strongly encouraged and incentivized

 

[BreatheUT]

Mr. Grab 'em By The * can pander to special interest like no politician ever has.

If paying hush money to a stripper/porn star doesn't scream Christian values .... what does?

More from the article....


“I really believe it’s the biggest thing missing from this country, the biggest thing. We have to bring back our religion. We have to bring back Christianity,” Trump said, prompting a big cheer from the crowd.

Despite a tight calendar of court appearances and campaigning, Trump appeared in Nashville with just two days to go before the South Carolina primary. The former president is the frontrunner against former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in her home state – as he is here in Tennessee. Voters here in the Volunteer State will cast ballots on Super Tuesday on March 5. Early voting is already underway.

 

[midnight orange]

I have already discussed the SolarWinds breach many times .... Trump sided with Russia over his own Secretary of State.

Why did he do that?

.... and don't say that the SolarWinds breach was insignificant. I can blow that up in a minute. It was a big deal, and a direct attack on American cyber-infrastructure.

Claims he doesn’t suffer from TDS. Denial phase.

 

[BowlBrother85]

“I really believe it’s the biggest thing missing from this country, the biggest thing. We have to bring back our religion. We have to bring back Christianity,” Trump said, prompting a big cheer from the crowd.

That is pretty funny. Thanks!

 

[BowlBrother85]

Claims he doesn’t suffer from TDS. Denial phase.

Simply wants an answer to a very reasonable question :

Why did Donald Trump side with Vladimir Putin over his own Secretary of State?

It is a reasonable question, but because you can't answer it, you have to act like there is something wrong with me for asking it.

 

[BreatheUT]

That is pretty funny. Thanks!

What makes that funny?

Do you believe this country, this world, is headed in the right direction morally?

 

[midnight orange]

Simply wants an explanation to a very reasonable question :

Why did Donald Trump side with Vladimir Putin over his own Secretary of State?

It is a reasonable question, but because you can't answer it, you have to act like there is something wrong with me for asking it.

Even the premise of your hypothetical question is riddled with TDS. You don’t even recognize it. Sorry, im not going to be an enabler to your delusions.

 

[BowlBrother85]

What makes that funny?

Do you believe this country, this world, is headed in the right direction morally?

The humor obviously comes from the hypocrite who is speaking it.

Do you honestly believe that Donald Trump embodies Christian values? Do you believe that Donald Trump upholds moral values?

 

[whodeycin85]

I have already discussed the SolarWinds breach many times .... Trump sided with Russia over his own Secretary of State.

Why did he do that?

.... and don't say that the SolarWinds breach was insignificant. I can blow that up in a minute. It was a big deal, and a direct attack on American cyber-infrastructure.

Didnt he and other government source say China was behind solarwinds..and that the MSM was hyping Russia because it get scares thier base

 

[Sea Ray]

He could have just said that and left it alone .... but he didn't.

The problem is that Trump said much more than that. He said that he would encourage Russia to "do whatever the hell they want," to a NATO member who was delinquent on their fees. That was irresponsible and reckless.

How bout if those delinquent NATO nations just pay their dues and be done with it? Wow, that’s a novel concept.

I betcha if Trump’s elected those countries will scrap the money together and checks will be written. I think Trump’s gotten their attention

 

[BowlBrother85]

Even the premise of your hypothetical question is riddled with TDS. You don’t even recognize it. Sorry, im not going to be an enabler to your delusions.

There is nothing hypothetical about it.

1) Mike Pompeo concluded that Russian-based actors were responsible for the SolarWinds trojan horse breach against American cyberinfrastructure.

2) Vladimir Putin denied Russia's involvement.

3) Donald Trump publicly sided with Putin.

The person in denial .... is you.