"We're just not making the kind of progress on the real important issues," Sankey said and complained of the NCAA's "inability to make progress on decisions.
"We talk about those issues," he said. "This draft is introduced. This direction might be changed. But if we just keep going through these same types of environments (provided and directed by the NCAA) to guide our decisions or rely on for our decisions, then we're going to have the same pace of change (slow), the same discourse, the same thinking that ideas are going to be generated from some other corner. And we need to make sure we take that responsibility."
"We want to try to introduce some new perspectives, some new ideas perhaps," Sankey said. "Or more importantly, help cut through the bureaucratic tape that we face so often as we try to effect change."
"We obviously have Attorney Generals that have been involved now in some of these state level activities," Sankey said. "None of that's contributing to the solid type of collegiate environment that we need."
Sankey returned to that subject later when Finebaum followed up.
"Given the environment we're in with the really big issues facing college sports, we've got a lot ahead of us in courts, in states and congress," he said. "I would like not to be in this circumstance (concerning Tennessee's lawsuit). But certainly, the Attorney Generals have the right to bring this. It will be decided. These things are going to be argued out. And we'll see the outcome, and then how we move forward from this particular matter."
"I tend to think if we look at the big scheme of things from an NCAA level and focus on trying to have the right set of oversight, make adjustments around outcomes of court cases, deal with the litigation that is already in front of us, that's the proper focus,"
"I think the pursuit of some of these particular cases through the enforcement process distracts us from solving the big problems," Sankey said.