Where does it stop, though? If you're going to make it all subjective, who's to say UGA isn't "better" than the four chosen? They were #1, undefeated for weeks with the longest win streak in the nation, and had one close loss on a night that wasn't their best. On a better night, when Bowers and McConkey aren't dinged up, UGA likely beats Bama (who almost lost several squeakers this year)... and maybe Washington... maybe even Texas or Michigan.
Bama has benefited from winning head-to-head and losing head-to-head in back-to-back seasons. Where's the line?
James L. Brooks had some great dialogue in "Broadcast News" about that. It's hard not to cross the line when they keep moving the little sucker. At what point is there no line at all?