BigSteve09
Moran
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 21,773
- Likes
- 132,454
the collectives cannot incentivize like thisI agree with your concern, and have the same. I would like to see more Vol Club communication to establish which athletes are partners and how well they did in the most recent game. At lease some sort of propaganda campaign at the stadium to try and increase the donor pool. I was shocked when I heard that there were less than 5,000 actual donors to the Vol Club.
But as a rabid fan that buys merchandise, drives the 6 hours to Knoxville a couple of times a year for games, travels to bowl games three or four times a decade, and is emotionally impacted by each win or loss, I would rather have faith in this new NIL thing and donate my money even when I don't have 100% clarity of the efficiency of the collective, than wait for 100% clarity and be passed by other programs that figure it out faster.
the fans can incentivize indirectly buy buying those players' merch (jerseys, autographed memorabilia, Nico pajamas, Squirrel toys, whatever else) whenever they have a great game.
I don't even know if I love the individual deals. My favorite NIL deal is the Texas OL one where they all get a cut. It incentivizes more elite OL to go to Texas because they know they're all going to get a cut of something huge, and it holds them accountable as a unit. I wish we had some OL deal sponsored by Calhoun's or Pilot or whoever else. Load that thing up and it would solve a lot of our problems.
Last edited: