The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#9,078
#9,078
ClearwaterVol said:
I think for the most part the challenges to elections are overblown bs and the losers should bow out gracefully. 2000 was an exception.

Trump wasn't just challenging this in courts he was urging people who had legally defined duties to simply ignore the law and insert him as president. You really don't see the difference? He was urging people to find X number of votes so he could win. It was and remains disgusting.
Click to expand...

You lawyers sure like to put words in peoples mouths, make assumptions and generally make asses out of yourselves.

How in the holy heck do you get I don't see the difference from my post? I was simply replying to a post letting the poster know that in fact Hillary did challenge the 2016 election in court although it was through a 3rd party. In no way was I making any sort of comparison.
 
#9,080
#9,080
Matt2496 said:
No one can deny that Trump is in big, big trouble. Odds are pretty decent that at least several of these charges will stick and he’ll serve serious jail time. Also, he can’t pardon himself on these state charges if he’s convicted. So, he’ll likely have to run for President from a jail cell.

This is going to get really nasty.
Click to expand...

Nobody is sending a former president to jail short of a treason conviction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,082
#9,082
hog88 said:
Nobody is sending a former president to jail short of a treason conviction.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


I would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40
#9,086
#9,086
“It was interesting to me to hear her insist that she wanted to try the case within six months, and that she was going to try all 19 of these folks together. I appreciate the fact that she wants to move the case, but that’s not going to happen. There’s just no feasible way to do it. You cannot try 19 defendants, and you’re certainly not going to try them on this kind of indictment with these allegations in six months.
She also knows where she falls, that she’s been last to indict and there are other trials already scheduled. So again, I read that this is a case — based on what we are seeing here, based on the number of defendants, based on what’s going to clearly going to be a marathon trial, not to mention a marathon jury selection — this case will be well past the election.”
 
#9,089
#9,089
Septic said:
Pretty sure she called Trump and conceded that night.

What I don't remember is hearing her on a voice recording asking a Secretary of State to "find" her just enough votes to win.
Click to expand...
She didn't concede until around 10 am the next morning, but it was a gracious concession speech. She said all the right things that losing candidates have always said (until Trump). She also attended Trump's inauguration ... which not every losing candidate does (see Trump again).

She did express some sour grapes later on ... but there is no comparison between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump when it comes to being a sore loser. Trump has set a new standard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#9,090
#9,090
  • Like
Reactions: theFallGuy
#9,091
#9,091
#9,092
#9,092
LadyVolette said:
Well, they hate it so there’s that 😂 I was having lunch in Franklin and my daughter and I were sitting next to these very odd looking people 😂 and they we’re basically discussing how much they hated American culture and they were leaving, but then the old hippie lady said, ‘but I would expat if I were younger’… she just couldn’t make the move..my GenZ daughter laughed and laughed later.. and can reinact it.. it was super crazy lol.. I have been to Europe several times.. do not want to live there 😂
Click to expand...
They sure do. They like the Venezuela model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyVolette
#9,093
#9,093
Orangeburst said:
in light of these lies and crimes to get Trump even thru the DOJ and courts, why should anyone believe any prosecution? they have no credibility..none.
Click to expand...

Sure they do.

Just wait until a Dem gets collared for something. I'm sure your faith in the justice system will be restored.
 
#9,095
#9,095
hog88 said:
Ahh, I see the problem now. You lack comprehension skills.

If you think Biden is in control you are more delusional than I thought. He is a puppet, who is pulling his strings I'm not exactly sure but it isn't Joe Biden making any major decisions. Yes I do firmly believe that whoever is behind the curtain pulling the strings is directing the timing and course of these indictments and politics is the driving force.

I never said it was "okay" (you sound like Donjo using that term) when Trump tried to order Barr to prosecute Hillary or Biden. What I said is that IF Trump really wanted either prosecuted he would have appointed an AG that would have done it. With Hillary at least there was ample evidence to justify a prosecution. But Trump didn't "AG shop" to get his wishes and most likely the reason was political just like the various prosecutions of Trump is political.
Click to expand...

WhY canT yOu reSpoNd tO My LoGic And ReaSoN!?!

😂🤣

There’s not one single piece of supporting evidence here. Literally not even one claim of fact other than reference to the indictments. Not in this post. Not in the public domain.

Yet you “firmly believe” all of this to be true. That isn’t even a conclusion, it’s just a fantasy.

The fantasy is premised on your own unwillingness to admit that any of Trump’s behavior is criminal or even wrong. That’s where you’re saying it’s “okay” for him to lobby for charges against political opponents (without even having to go back to 2019 posts, where I know you defended him and said there wasn’t enough evidence 🙄).
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40
#9,097
#9,097
Septic said:
Sure they do.

Just wait until a Dem gets collared for something. I'm sure your faith in the justice system will be restored.
Click to expand...
if Trump broke the law..throw him in prison
what we have so far is thin nonsense.
You guys had a chance to demand accountability and took a hard pass, just because it was Trump.
Lies, crimes and crickets
 
#9,098
#9,098
RockyTop85 said:
WhY canT yOu reSpoNd tO My LoGic And ReaSoN!?!

😂🤣

There’s not one single piece of supporting evidence here. Literally not even one claim of fact other than reference to the indictments. Not in this post. Not in the public domain.

Yet you “firmly believe” all of this to be true. That isn’t even a conclusion, it’s just a fantasy.

The fantasy is premised on your own unwillingness to admit that any of Trump’s behavior is criminal or even wrong. That’s where you’re saying it’s “okay” for him to lobby for charges against political opponents (without even having to go back to 2019 posts, where I know you defended him and said there wasn’t enough evidence 🙄).
Click to expand...

Look Donjo, we'll let the courts decide if his behavior was criminal, without a doubt his behavior was wrong and there is a difference. I have not a clue what you are referencing from 2019.

The rest of your post is another one of your famous word salads that doesn't make sense, is not based on anything except your fragile emotions and quite frankly pretty dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,099
#9,099
BowlBrother85 said:
She didn't concede until around 10 am the next morning, but it was a gracious concession speech. She said all the right things that losing candidates have always said (until Trump). She also attended Trump's inauguration ... which not every losing candidate does (see Trump again).

She did express some sour grapes later on ... but there is no comparison between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump when it comes to being a sore loser. Trump has set a new standard.
Click to expand...
"sour grapes". She inferred the election was stolen from her and Trump was illegitimate President on multiple occasions.

Don’t Forget Hillary Clinton | National Review
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmacvols1
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top