Gun control debate (merged)

[C-south]

Chalk up another W for the second amendment. Founding fathers remain undefeated in their infallible wisdom.

Gotta keeps it real. Can’t dizrespek me.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Gotta keeps it real. Can’t dizrespek me.
View attachment 555482

Def Ultra-MAGA Right.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Chalk up another W for the second amendment. Founding fathers remain undefeated in their infallible wisdom.

I heard tonight that multiple handguns were found at the scene and that the shooting was apparently a targeted attack.

Would you care to address the above, or do you prefer to continue your ignorant remarks?

 

[volfanhill]

Chalk up another W for the second amendment. Founding fathers remain undefeated in their infallible wisdom.

The wisdom is in the ability to modify what they wrote. And insuring it wasn't a simple majority. Brilliant

 

[volfanhill]

Finally a gun grabber understands how this works.

Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access

 

[hog88]

Finally a gun grabber understands how this works.

Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access

He’s a POS but I respect the fact he finally wants to do it right.

 

[Grand Vol]

He’s a POS but I respect the fact he finally wants to do it right.

Not sure it'll pass SCOTUS test though.

 

[hog88]

Not sure it'll pass SCOTUS test though.

How so? Wouldn't a duly ratified amendment be automatically constitutional?

 

[Grand Vol]

How so? Wouldn't a duly ratified amendment be automatically constitutional?

When it conflicts with another Amendment?

 

[hog88]

When it conflicts with another Amendment?

Didn't the 21st conflict with the 18th?

 

[Grand Vol]

Didn't the 21st conflict with the 18th?

It repealed the 18th. What Newsome proposed does not do that...

Or I thought I read that

 

[hog88]

It repealed the 18th. What Newsome proposed does not do that...

Or I thought I read that

I could absolutely be wrong but I just can't see how a ratified amendment to the constitution could even be challenged in the courts let alone be found unconstitutional.

 

[85SugarVol]

I could absolutely be wrong but I just can't see how a ratified amendment to the constitution could even be challenged in the courts let alone be found unconstitutional.

Which will supersede the other?

2A - no infringements are legal
28A - these infringements are legal

I don’t know the answer either.

 

[82_VOL_83]

I fall in the category of guns are killing a lot of innocent people, and this is a problem that must be addressed. You fall in the category of "I don't care so long as I can play sheriff-wannabe."

So comically lame liar.

 

[hndog609]

I could absolutely be wrong but I just can't see how a ratified amendment to the constitution could even be challenged in the courts let alone be found unconstitutional.

I would have thought their approach would be to repeal the 2A outright and sell the idea of it being entirely a state issue.

 

[Grand Vol]

I could absolutely be wrong but I just can't see how a ratified amendment to the constitution could even be challenged in the courts let alone be found unconstitutional.

It would be like someone passing the 28th Amendment that says the President can hold office for three terms without putting in language to repeal the 22nd Amendment.

You can't have two Amendments that conflict each other without one being repealed by the language in the other.

Of course, our government would never have laws that contradict each other...

 

[hog88]

This is good news. Too many complied but I like the defiance.

Biden and ATF just created 29 million felons

The owners of just 0.6% to 1% of AR-15-style pistols have complied with a May 31 deadline set by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to register their firearms.

 

[LouderVol]

This is good news. Too many complied but I like the defiance.

Biden and ATF just created 29 million felons

and apparently 29 million new felons is a good thing according to our gun grabbing nuts.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I could absolutely be wrong but I just can't see how a ratified amendment to the constitution could even be challenged in the courts let alone be found unconstitutional.

Leftist judges, legislators and district attorneys say hi.

 

[illumiVOLi]

Leftist judges, legislators and district attorneys say hi.

Fed up Americans, gun owners and patriots say… bang bang!

 

[85SugarVol]

This is good news. Too many complied but I like the defiance.

Biden and ATF just created 29 million felons

What does this even mean?

It’s even bigger than the refusal by 98% in Connecticut to register bullet-holding magazines.

 

[hog88]

What does this even mean?

I think they are estimating that 98% of people didn't register their greater than 10 round magazines.

 

[85SugarVol]

I think they are estimating that 98% of people didn't register their greater than 10 round magazines.

That would make sense to me. I missed the 10 round limit. I only saw -

“register bullet-holding magazines”

 

[kiddiedoc]

That would make sense to me. I missed the 10 round limit. I only saw -

“register bullet-holding magazines”

This is what happens when people who have no idea what they are talking about try to have an argument about guns (see: certain posters in this thread)

Or, then again, maybe the law doesn't apply to magazines that hold poison darts, smokescreen, or stun rays.

 

[85SugarVol]

This is what happens when people who have no idea what they are talking about try to have an argument about guns (see: certain posters in this thread)

Or, then again, maybe the law doesn't apply to magazines that hold poison darts, smokescreen, or stun rays.

I read that and said wtf. “Bullet holding magazine”. What else you gonna put in there, skittles?