Well, I don't really have any concerns about this team or staff. I think our players are going to be much improved, our roster improved, and we're going to field a very good team (injuries notwithstanding). I also think we may have the most effective staff in the NCAA.
Next season's win/loss column may not accurately reflect any of this, but... that's college football.
To clarify for the sake of peaceful discussion, I'm only saying that bowl games are unique because of the additional prep time the full coaching staff has. That also includes hours you don't get in regular season from assistants who are collecting and breaking down video weeks in advance of scheduled opponents. With all hands on deck and everyone devoting their time to a single matchup (unless in the playoffs), bowl games are "chess matches" to an extent that regular season games just cannot be.
As for individual performance on those first half blitzes, Beasley's sacks came off of unimpeded sprints toward a freshman quarterback. But I don't think anyone should presume anything from those two plays about how good or bad a linebacker Beasley was or will be. On those plays he was the chess piece, and he did (with speed and great timing) what the coaches prepared him to do. There's no denigration in that.
The intent of my original post was to encourage that we not burden Beasley (or any Tennessee player) with pre-season expectations--not because I don't think he's a good LB, but just to let him keep developing and improving according to his potential, and not have his future play judged by the spotlight role he played (successfully) in a January chess match.
We wouldn't do it to our own sons, and we want this program to be special, to be a family. We want recruits to become Vols For Life.