President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#43,305
#43,305
whodeycin85 said:
The fact it has been confirmed multiple times as her diary means the contents within are hers until she says they are not or an investigation into forgery is done...both of with uavr not happened...couple all that with Joe's history with Jill and his behavior around kids.
Click to expand...
Show me a statute which says that ... LOL.

You are talking out of your butt.

The involvement of Project Veritas in this matter taints the hell out of the story. You show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject, and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge entries in a diary.

Do I need to post that link again? Because I absolutely will ....
 
#43,306
#43,306
BowlBrother85 said:
Show me statute which says that ... LOL.

You are talking out of your butt.

The involvement of Project Veritas in this matter taints the hell out of the story. You show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject, and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge entries in a diary.

Do I need to post that link again? Because I absolutely will ....
Click to expand...
Dude. She claimed it originally, asks for it back....took it back when dropped at the police station..and now in court confirmed....min sorry you voted and support Joe...but the diary has merit...sorry you don't wanna believe it to true...oh btw Ashley also exhibits all the sign of a sexually abused child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and ButchPlz
#43,309
#43,309
whodeycin85 said:
Dude. She claimed it originally,
Click to expand...
She acknowledged that it was her diary.
whodeycin85 said:
asks for it back....took it back when dropped at the police station
Click to expand...
It was her property, and she retrieved it.
whodeycin85 said:
and now in court confirmed
Click to expand...
For the 3rd time now ... Yes, the diary belongs to her. However, the authenticity of those entries concerning showering with her dad were not authenticated in Court as you tried to claim yesterday.
whodeycin85 said:
min sorry you voted and support Joe...but the diary has merit.
Click to expand...
The involvement of Project Veritas in this matter taints what you call "merit." Once again, you show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject with $10K to lie about voter fraud ... and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge entries in a diary.

Looks like I'm going to have to post that link again. Will be back in a minute.
 
#43,310
#43,310
BowlBrother85 said:
She acknowledged that it was her diary.

It was her property, and she retrieved it.

For the 3rd time now ... Yes, the diary belongs to her. However, the authenticity of those entries concerning showering with her dad were not authenticated in Court as you tried to claim yesterday.

The involvement of Project Veritas in this matter taints what you call "merit." Once again, you show me an investigative reporter who will bribe an interview subject with $10K to lie about voter fraud ... and I will show you an investigative reporter who will forge entries in a diary.

Look's like I'm going to have to post that link again. Will be back in a minute.
Click to expand...
Again...I said she claimed it and you argued...I said until she says otherwise her claiming it give the contents credibility until she states other wise. And court documents say that PV did use a handwriting expert to confirm...so if she says it hers and an expert says the writing is the verified as the same...any reasonably sane and sober person would concluded the content as real until she specifies different...and after 2 years not. Peep
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, dovervolz, FREAKIN ORANGE and 1 other person
#43,312
#43,312
BowlBrother85 said:
No, it doesn't.

This is what the filing specifically says, and I will place in bold what appears to be most relevant to those "controversial" diary passages :

1) In September 2020, sources identified as R.K. (Robert Kurlander) and A.H. (Aimee Harris) contacted Project Veritas to report that they found a diary authored by Ashley Biden. Motion to Appoint Special Master 3, ECF No. 1. According to the sources, Biden left the diary and other belongings behind when she moved out of a house in Delray Beach, FL, that one of the sources subsequently occupied. Petition for return of property 4.

2) The sources described and sent messages of information from the diary and offered to bring the diary and other belongings to New York. R.K. (Robert Kurlander) and A.H. (Aimee Harris) requested payment from Project Veritas for the diary; their lawyers and Project Veritas' lawyers negotiated an agreement for the diary to be delivered to Project Veritas. Property pet. 4.

3) Project Veritas worked to authenticate the diary and engaged a handwriting expert; it began producing a video news story.

4) Project Veritas reached a Biden acquaintance who conferenced a person who identified herself as Biden. Biden stated the belongings were hers and asked that they be delivered to a friend in Delray Beach.

5) Project Veritas believed that the diary was authored by Biden and worked to finalize the news story about the diary and continued to analyze the contents of the diary. Id. at 5.

6) Petitioner O'Keefe decided against publishing the story. The email explaining his decision was printed in full in a filing with the court.

7) Another news website ran a story about Biden's brother which renewed Project Veritas' efforts to investigate the diary.

8) Project Veritas was contacted by a lawyer for Biden. Project Veritas offered to return the property to Biden if she agreed to view it personally and confirm her ownership; Biden's lawyer refused.

9) Project Veritas learned that another news organization had received a copy of the diary and the other news organization was concerned it was not authentic. Mr. O'Keefe again decided not to publish the story.

10) Shortly thereafter, a blog published the diary; it attributed its sources as a "whistleblower at another media organization that chose not to publish the diary."

11) In early November 2020, Project Veritas arranged for the delivery of the diary and other belongings to the Delray Beach, FL Police Department.

The Government, for its part, has been more circumspect in its public statements to the Court regarding the relevant factual background and its investigation. It characterized Project Veritas' assertions as "either false or misleading .... and directly contradicted by the evidence described in the sworn affidavits that were submitted to the federal magistrate judge in support of the search warrants." Government's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motions for Appointment of Special Master 3.

On August 25, 2022, Robert Kurlander and Aimee Harris pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property ....
Click to expand...
@whodeycin85

Here it is again.

Check Line Item #3 :

It only says that Project Veritas "engaged" a handwriting expert. It does not say that the handwriting expert confirmed authenticity. This gets so old. You are dishonest, man.
 
#43,314
#43,314




Since you guys are too lazy to read ... I will post the video of it. Please watch it. This speaks directly to the integrity of Project Veritas. They are not above forging entries in a diary.
 
#43,315
#43,315
BowlBrother85 said:
@whodeycin85

Here it is again.

Check Line Item #3 :

It only says that Project Veritas "engaged" a handwriting expert. It does not say that the handwriting expert confirmed authenticity. This gets so old. You are dishonest, man.
Click to expand...
Again any sane and sober person could reasonably agree that if a person whom owned the diary would confirm that it was in deed theirs, much like if a person was pulled over with a unlicensed gun in avehicle they own...they can't pull the it's not mine with out PROOF...now if no one come out and denies the contents then it's reasonable to assume ownership of said content belongs to the person whom claimed it....as far as the expert you left out the worked to authenticate by engagingly an expert..very different statement. Engaging a handwriting expert is simply saying yea it hand writing working to authenticate is a different level of engagement....post your links and your sad sad denials...I'm done with you. It's pathetic
 
#43,316
#43,316
BowlBrother85 said:
@whodeycin85

Here it is again.

Check Line Item #3 :

It only says that Project Veritas "engaged" a handwriting expert. It does not say that the handwriting expert confirmed authenticity. This gets so old. You are dishonest, man.
Click to expand...

Thanks for calling posters liars & being dishonest on here that see things in a different light than you do ... I bet you're a hoot at parties. It's what democrats do to other people that disagree w/them. You need to lay off drinking those Red Bulls somewhat.
 
Last edited:
#43,318
#43,318
BowlBrother85 said:
But you wouldn't believe Ashley Biden if she said that the diary had been forged. Nor would you believe a handwriting expert who said the same thing.
Click to expand...
Has she said it was forged? Has an independent handwriting analysis been done?

I've already acknowledged I don't know the truth. You're the one who keeps pushing what you want to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz and NorthDallas40
#43,319
#43,319
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Thanks for calling people liars & dishonest on here that see things in a different light than you do ... I bet you're a hoot at parties.
Click to expand...
You know, I could have a blast talking to most of the people that post here. There are only a couple of jerks that I have nothing to say anything to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, SpaceCoastVol and 2 others
#43,322
#43,322
Weezer said:
Has she said it was forged? Has an independent handwriting analysis been done?

I've already acknowledged I don't know the truth. You're the one who keeps pushing what you want to be true.
Click to expand...
She has not addressed the issue, one way or another. It wouldn't change anyone's mind if she did. You would call her a liar if she said that the entry concerning showers with her father had been forged, She has nothing to gain by publicly commenting on it. People will believe what they want to believe.
 
#43,323
#43,323
BowlBrother85 said:
I would believe whatever she said. PERIOD.
Click to expand...

It can be reasonably argued that she'd have reasons to say it didn't happen, even if it did. But with no actual proof one way or the other, I agree you have to take her at her word. But why hasn't she spoken out if all of this is false? Seems like she could end lots of speculation just by issuing a press release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#43,324
#43,324
whodeycin85 said:
much like if a person was pulled over with a unlicensed gun in avehicle they own...they can't pull the it's not mine with out PROOF.
Click to expand...
That's apples to oranges. One is a crime and the other is not. Ashley Biden does not have to prove anything. She has done nothing wrong in regard to this matter. If anything, she is a victim. There isn't a burden of proof which rests with her. She does not have to prove a damn thing.
 
#43,325
#43,325
whodeycin85 said:
as far as the expert you left out the worked to authenticate by engagingly an expert..very different statement. Engaging a handwriting expert is simply saying yea it hand writing working to authenticate is a different level of engagement..
Click to expand...
The filing does not address the authenticity of the diary entry concerning showers, as you have tried to suggest.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top