THAT WAS MY OPINION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!For reference - you stated what the breakdown is and asked people to consider why that breakdown was correct and how it came about.
I think it's a little more complicated than that. This was a classic case of the "fixer" being played for a fall guy. Cohen is not sympathetic either, but nobody is being reasonable when they suggest that he orchestrated this payment on his own accord, without any direction or guidance from Trump at all. Before 2017, I don't think Cohen was at liberty to excuse himself to a urinal without Trump's written consent.
THAT WAS MY OPINION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I stated up front it was only estimation based on opinion.
They should come up with their estimation based on their opinion and consider what that means, how it came about, and the future implications.
Good grief, sometimes I get a glimmer...........
I acknowledged in an earlier post that maybe the lack of responses indicated some were thinking it through and maybe just uncomfortable with their conclusions.check your wording which I reposted - it tells a different story whether intentional or unintentional.
also, not answering your question isn't an indication that people are reluctant to engage in a little self analysis - that's a peculiar conclusion, an awfully big leap about someone simply because they don't answer.
Do you know what the crime they are going to charge?
@hog88 please offer you wisdom on speaking to wives in a calming manner.
seems to be accounting related to how the payment was documented
Reimbursement for the payment was falsely recorded as legal expenses, according to federal prosecutors who first examined the case, and Bragg’s office is considering bringing a felony charge based on the falsification of business records. The charge carries a possible prison term of up to four years.
from Politico
When my wife got accepted into medical school, my dumba** friends must have thought she was already a doctor. One of them called and said “Hey man. I’m about to send you a picture of the sh** I just took. Show it to your wife, it doesn’t look right.”I prefer phone pictures to actual diapers. Nobody needs to see that #$*!
At what point does Trump's own behavior start to matter? It seems like he is always the innocent victim. The fact that a stripper was paid hush money never registers with his apologists. As long as it's not a crime, then it's like it doesn't even matter.
When my wife got accepted into medical school, my dumba** friends must have thought she was already a doctor. One of them called and said “Hey man. I’m about to send you a picture of the sh** I just took. Show it to your wife, it doesn’t look right.”
Had to lay down some ground rules for the pro bono consultations after that.
At what point does Trump's own behavior start to matter? It seems like he is always the innocent victim. The fact that a stripper was paid hush money never registers with his apologists. As long as it's not a crime, then it's like it doesn't even matter.
Michael Cohen was convicted of facilitating an unlawful corporate campaign contribution (from The National Enquirer by way of David Pecker). ....They had Cohen on tax evasion. He plead to the campaign stuff without it being taken in court. So yes technically he was found guilty but it wasn't what they had Cohen on and the DOJ never pursued it with Trump.
Why is being uncomfortable with a conclusion a negative thing? It could be a very positive thing.
Why would you immediately assume it is a negative may be the better question?