orange parmejohn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Messages
- 15,374
- Likes
- 10,909
It's like everything Wheaton says is ultimately qualified by the fact that our coaches didn't coach at UT last year. Thus (by his reasoning), nothing they've done in the past is predictive of their future.
Yet, at the same time, everything last year's UT coaches did is predictive of what our team will do this year.
It really is not rocket science here.
What the players did last year is relevant to this year. Not the coaches. But, things could change. We've all seen teams turn around and "come of age." I'm not trying to argue against that possibility.
I have already said that what the coaches did in the past is relevant. But, how indicative it is remains to be seen. Simply because there have been coaches with glorious histories not produce the same results in new situations. Kiffin didn't exactly reproduce the success of Reggie Bush USC when he was with the Raiders. You could argue that he didn't have the players. But, then you might have to look at what the current UT players did last year.
It got overlooked the first time, so I'll say it a little differently.
I think you guys are letting one guy trying to pour on a case for his school make you think his school has more of a shot than it actually does.
If he's a Vol, then what did Miami do to make him not want to go there?? He was supposed to be a midtermer and then something happened. I still say that Miami is holding on right now. His family is too involved in this and if Arthur stays in Miami, then Bryce is a Cane.
I believe Kiffin took the Raiders from something like the 28th ranked rushing attacked to 6th in the NFL while he was with Oakland.
fyp.
Think about it rationally: If he went to Oregon he and his brother would literally be at opposite ends of the nation.
