Gun control debate (merged)

[K-town Vol Fan]

You realize you’re making points for the other team right now, don’t you?

How so

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Yes you are if you think a pro 2a person doesn’t know the gun grabbers talking points . I’ll give you bonus ones that if you say them , people we just tune you out “ reasonable and rational , assault rifle , weapons of war “ all are used constantly by grabbers to try to get people to normalize them and accept them . Not happening .

I think you are probably a regular viewer of Fox News.

 

[StarRaider]

No one wants your precious firearms. We just want to make to where, oh, idk, an 18 year old kid with a history of mental illness and even had been in trouble for threatening to shoot up a school, can't go buy an AR 15 and unload on children. All the school shootings we have in this country, can you not agree step 1 might be not letting HS kids legally buy a gun?

You ok with it being a felony for potheads to own guns like the current law is already written? Do "we" want to keep that part?

 

[kiddiedoc]

 

[hog88]

Wasn't a problem for the Uvalde shooter.

Yea, just goes to show how ineffective additional laws would be when the current ones don’t work.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Some idiot I think he's a congressman. Just said he wants to ban all semi automatic firearms. That would effectively ban 98% of all firearms in the country.

 

[0nelilreb]

I think you are probably a regular viewer of Fox News.

I can’t tell you when the last time was that I watched any MSM opinion shows . I am a regular reader and a history buff , I trust history as a teacher and should be used to seek out root problems that we have today . How’s your history knowledge ?

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

You ok with it being a felony for potheads to own guns like the current law is already written? Do "we" want to keep that part?

Don't really care but, for my own education, what does this law state?

 

[Orangeslice13]

Yea, just goes to show how ineffective additional laws would be when the current ones don’t work.

Awwww
Now we don’t know how long it would take for him to figure it out

 

[lawgator1]

Can you sue Ford for building a Mustang that can go 180 mph?

You can try.

 

[0nelilreb]

View attachment 460567

Ohhhh ouch lol

 

[TN Ribs]

Yet for some reason, more and more people keep tuning in. Sucks to be a Dem, doesn’t it?

That's because Fox panders to the lowest common denominator. They know what they are doing, if only their viewers knew they were getting hustled.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Yea, just goes to show how ineffective additional laws would be when the current ones don’t work.

Why aren't they being enforced? Why was the Uvalde shooter legally able to purchase 2 ARs? Where was the failure? Thats where we need to look.

 

[StarRaider]

Don't really care but, for my own education, what does this law state?

google form 4473, read it, and report back.

 

[0nelilreb]

That's because Fox panders to the lowest common denominator. They know what they are doing, if only their viewers knew they were getting hustled.

You mean viewers like .. @lawgator1 ?

 

[AshG]

View attachment 460567

Wow, talk about sacrilege.

Let's not forget he told his disciples to not harm the guards and restored the ear of the soldier after being struck.

Kyrie Eleison.

 

[StarRaider]

That's because Fox panders to the lowest common denominator. They know what they are doing, if only their viewers knew they were getting hustled.

bless your white libtard guilty heart

 

[Orangeslice13]

You mean viewers like .. @lawgator1 ?

Beat me too it

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Just listening to 10 minutes of the dimocrats at this hearing proves why you can't trust them with making gun laws. Because they know absolutely nothing about firearms in general.

You can't make "common sense" laws if you don't have any idea about what your making the law about.

It would be like having the Amish regulating the power grid.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

yep, IDK the exact law and I don't need it. There is a law about owning guns with a cannabis card. weed smokers are not out here shooting people lmao. Weed smokers don't even give a ****. We would rather people smoke weed than buy guns.... but even so, I have had a pistol my whole life and never committed a crime. I don't need the AR, I need the weed, and when I do need the AR it will be provided for me. I've shot an ar off only about three times, and that thing was so butter I was popping tennis balls from 40 yards with no previous experience. Didn't need it.

 

[OrangeTsar]

That's because Fox panders to the lowest common denominator. They know what they are doing, if only their viewers knew they were getting hustled.

yes, if only we were all so very wise and virtuous like you.

 

[0nelilreb]

Beat me too it

I knew I had to be fast on that one , talk about your low hanging fruit

 

[Orangeslice13]

Wow, talk about sacrilege.

Let's not forget he told his disciples to not harm the guards and restored the ear of the soldier after being struck.

Kyrie Eleison.

You’re right. That kid never should have brought up Messiah.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

google form 4473, read it, and report back.

Thanks.

I'm fine with it. I thinks its wrong, but its the govt so I'm not surprised. I do believe it should be changed. There is no question about drinking, and the impairment level is waaaay higher, just happens to be legal. Its backwards.

 

[StarRaider]

yep, IDK the exact law and I don't need it. There is a law about owning guns with a cannabis card. weed smokers are not out here shooting people lmao. Weed smokers don't even give a ****. We would rather people smoke weed than buy guns.... but even so, I have had a pistol my whole life and never committed a crime. I don't need the AR, I need the weed, and when I do need the AR it will be provided for me. I've shot an ar of only about three times, and that thing was so butter I was popping tennis balls from 40 yards with no previous experience. Didn't need it.

wrong again. But just so you know you committed a felony. Congrats.