War in Ukraine

6fqq3t.jpg
 
Russia has many more military resources than Ukraine. Between western arms and Russian incompetence Ukraine (David) has been able to force a stalemate with Russia (Goliath). Given the circumstances this is a win for Ukraine.


We've covered this before, multiple times. As I said quit being obtuse it isn't a good look.
It's not a win for Ukraine when Russia still has regions of the Donbass and Southern Ukraine occupied. If they end up cutting off Ukraine completely from the Black Sea - which Russia could very well do - then Ukraine is in big trouble.

Either way. It isn't our conflict to get involved in anymore. Getting involved only benefits certain members of our political class and the military industrial complex. Let the UK and Poland handle it.

So which one is it? Russia is a force to be reckoned with and Ukraine needs our help or are they so incompetent that Ukraine can handle them on their own?

Not being obtuse. I'm stating facts you all don't like to hear. And I'm repeating these ridiculous statements made by posters on here. So perhaps your issue is with those posters and not me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
You think Tulsi is viable candidate. Her policies are crap. No republicans would ever agree with her ideas. She talked shat to Hilary. You just like and endorse loud mouth clowns. And yes you got me. I wish GW was our king.
Dude is a clear masterDEbater for sure. Just keeps racking up those internet debate logic wins 😂
 
You think Tulsi is viable candidate. Her policies are crap. No republicans would ever agree with her ideas. She talked shat to Hilary. You just like and endorse loud mouth clowns. And yes you got me. I wish GW was our king.
Tulsi isn't a viable candidate? Unlikely I could vote for her but that really seems like a stretch. It's consider her viable
 
Tulsi isn't a viable candidate? Unlikely I could vote for her but that really seems like a stretch. It's consider her viable
I think her cultish background will block her. From what I've read there's one guy who tells her what to think. Or maybe that was a smear.
 
Yeah. But it'd still be s non sequiter to the conversation.

If you have to hustle in unrelated arguments to try and give weight to your point, then your point wasn't very good to begin with.
Not really a non sequitur. The people running The West into the ditch right now are supporters of this woke ideology.
 
Depending on whose numbers you look at Russia has lost almost 95% of the tanks they brought to Ukraine originally and over 50% of the original invasion force has been killed or injured.

This will go down in history as one of the all time greatest military f#ckups right along side The Battle of Marathon, The Battle of Tours, Battle of Little Bighorn (Custers last stand), and the Battle of Midway.
Those are some pretty bold and eye popping numbers.
 
Oh no, the money still goes to Ukraine because it makes the destruction of the incompetent Russian military quicker. The quicker this war ends the quicker I can get back to that part of the world on vacation. Our (and NATO) support has already made Russia for the most part combat ineffective with their Ukrainian invasion force with their staggering equipment losses and a 10% casualty rate.

Makes you wonder why Pootin isn't sending in more clowns?
If we continue to run Russia into the ground in this manner, we will go bankrupt.

"If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined."
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Advertisement

Back
Top