VolStrom
He/Him/Gator Hater
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2008
- Messages
- 19,696
- Likes
- 30,382
You are right. But will you also acknowledge that people get upset when the person they voted for gets regime changed by foreign countries? The very regions that heavily supported Yanukovich are the main ones didn't want anything to do with the Kiev regime after 2014.Bait and switch is pretty bad form in elections. People tend to be less than forgiving when they thought they elected Hyde and it turns out they got Jekyll. A lot of us are wishing the US had a presidential recall process.
That was from a university here in the United States. I was making the point that even our own history textbooks here in the U.S. are obviously flawed. There's also the Southern Strategy myth these college textbooks are teaching. I can tear apart that myth in no time.
Second. I've been told college professors are nothing but a bunch of liberals. Why I should listen to them if they are a bunch of liberals? Same with our mainstream media. I don't need to listen to them and need to do my own research and come up with my own conclusions. Correct?
I'm a free and independent thinker. That's what I've been encouraged and told I should do years ago and is exactly what I have done. Or is free and independent thinking something you are against?
"If NATO had stepped in, the war would have been done in like less than a week, but because everyone sat back and watched, well, we are seeing all those civilians dying."
He said he's equally skeptical of the West's approach going forward. What Ukraine needs, he said, are boots on the ground.
After too many close calls, he said, he won't be returning to the eastern front.
"I did my time there. For now, I will do humanitarian aid. I'll just stay here in Lviv and be as useful as I can be."
That's what impeachment was supposed to be. Unfortunately the American left turned that into a farce and somewhat stigmatized it conveniently before placing a walking vegetable into office.
What Putin and the Russians did was prevent regime change in Syria and helped to stop the killing brought on by ISIS and the Free Syrian army. The US came in and started flooding the place with weapons that ended up in the hands of ISIS.And you said that an autocratic fascist leader who routinely abuses the freedom of his people, kills or imprisons his opponents, and invades a sovereign country to kill innocent people is worthy of a Nobel peace prize. So who’s the one really ignoring reality here?
My comment was in response to this...
I think I agree with everything you posted here. I'm just wondering how this disagrees with what @DonjoVol was talking about? I guess that first sentence is what is throwing me off a bit.Do you think prejudice and revisionism have a place in history? Should universities be about dogma and ideologies or about fact? Perhaps just lay out the fact and let students discuss what the facts mean rather than tell them what it means? Of course that also implies including all fact so the course isn't narrowed to a "desired" path. Maybe textbooks themselves are a big part of the problem since they can be tailored to a view and selected by professors who like that particular view. Have you ever wondered about new histories and biographies written decades and even centuries after older ones - like what has been lost and if anything new has truly been found to change history. Does reinterpretation of historic fact to today's standards rather than yesterday's standards of conduct totally skew historic evaluation? We have a huge problem with people looking at past events with our current perspective rather than what was acceptable and considered common practice at the time.
I used to believe the worst about Islam. But in reality, Islam is no better or worse than any other religion.History still tends to show that Islam doesn't play well with others. If Islam is in the majority, it's "my way or the highway". If Islam isn't in the majority, there are always the terrorist incidents that go along with Islamic zealousness. Islam too often doesn't seem to believe in moderation. It's not a religion as much as a fundamental way of life, and that changes everything.
On a national level? Let's think about that very carefully for a moment. If we do not use the popular vote to elect a president, what mechanism would you suggest to recall a president?Recall elections. Where people say this isn't what I signed up for in large enough numbers to force a recall vote. Accountability. The ability to un-elect "representatives" who change paths ... or in a current case aren't up to the job at all.
I think I agree with everything you posted here. I'm just wondering how this disagrees with what @DonjoVol was talking about? I guess that first sentence is what is throwing me off a bit.
On a national level? Let's think about that very carefully for a moment. If we do not use the popular vote to elect a president, what mechanism would you suggest to recall a president?
I feel like Ukraine is going to have to seize some of Russia's lands in order to get a surrender or capitulation. It sounds like Ukrainian forces are starting to push back against Russia.
$150 million, in the grand scheme of things (compared to $33 billion) does what?
Biden Signs New $150 Million Military Aid Package For Ukraine | ZeroHedge