You're going to say "do you think American intervention just happened yesterday" when I posted historical American stupidity in the post you responded to? Now it's getting to silly season. You know what's funny? You are for the cutting off of some types of corrupt bureaucrats (here) while for the support of other types of corrupt bureaucrats (abroad) with the end result that people are going to suffer badly at the hands of our interventions and machinations and stupid wasteful spending and efforts around the world. I laugh because it is patently stupid to claim one cutting of spending is waste (the DOE) while another is good (funding a country who does nothing for the average United States citizen). What is that but waste? I theorize that you just like wanking to dead Russians, blood, and combat footage based on your horrifically immoral posts in this very thread.
"I don't approve of conflict, but I hope lots of people die and suffer as long as they're Russian", to loosely quote you.
Not only do you not at all care about the prices your kids and grandkids will be paying for this awful stance, you seem to be gearing yourself to raising bloodthirsty maniacs just like yourself all the while. No wonder this country is going to hell in a handbasket- you feels-based emotional fools are no better than virtue signaling liberals, kicking the can of responsibility down the road in weak, weak, weakness. The American right is nothing but dead weight.
It is amazing how many incorrect assumptions you can make about me.
If a person wants to argue against our involvement here, there are plenty of worthy reasons to argue against it. With respect to using money as the primary argument, it doesn’t raise an eyebrow from me. The money we spend here is like pissing in the ocean and if we spent zero, it won’t correct our current spending behavior.
 
				 
						 
 
		

 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		