War in Ukraine

Ukrainian's are woopin Russian's, putting gas in fruit jars and blowing up tanks and
blew up a ship last week
Ukrainian strong
1648476889358.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Why is the WH walking back Bidens comment? Thought it was a good thing

Do you seriously not understand why the President of the USA in his official capacity in a major policy speech openly calling for the removal of a nuclear armed head of state who is currently in a hot war in Eastern Europe is a really stupid thing? That needs to be explained to you?

really-seriously.gif
 
Do you seriously not understand why the President of the USA in his official capacity in a major policy speech openly calling for the removal of a nuclear armed head of state who is currently in a hot war in Eastern Europe is a really stupid thing? That needs to be explained to you?

really-seriously.gif
Do I have to break out blue for you?
 
Imagine learning about World War II and thinking Philippe Petain was the hero and Churchill was the villain.

I do understand what you mean but , Churchill made a deal with the devil in Stalin also willing to overlook so very horrible things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
As opposed to your very trusted sources of Vlad Putin and Russian TV? You act as though you are on the frontlines and have all the "legitimate" inside information and everything else is just anti Russian propaganda. It's pretty comical
This is his go to source.

Political views
The 29 April 2016 "Unmasking Zero Hedge" article by Bloomberg quoted former website staffer Colin Lokey as saying: "I can't be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It's wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run. This isn't a revolution. It's a joke." Lokey told Bloomberg that he was pressured to frame issues in a way he felt was "disingenuous," summarizing its political stances as "Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft."[27] Lokey provided chat transcripts in which Ivandjiiski refers to America's "silent majority" as "beastly", while Backshall acknowledges life in the U.S. is bad "outside of my bubble".[27]
Wallace-Wells noted that the site demonstrated a pro-Russia bias, stating the site had a "pointed" Russophilia.[33]
In a series of articles in June–July 2017, the Financial Times, covering an event organised by one of the site's bloggers,[q] said that, "It probably didn't help that ZeroHedge was also used as a lead-in for a 2016 New Yorker piece about the alt-right, despite its financial focus and a political bent that is more Drudge than Richard Spencer."[34]
In January 2020, when the site was removed from Twitter, BuzzFeed News described Zero Hedge as "pro-Trump" and "far-right",[29] while reporting on the removal, The Washington Postsaid that Zero Hedge "In recent years, the blog has amplified right-wing conspiracy theories on a range of topics".[15]
In March 2020, American journalist Seth Hettena wrote an opinion-piece in The New Republictitled "Is Zero Hedge a Russian Trojan Horse?", and provided details on the links between Krassimir Ivandjiiski (the site publisher's Bulgarian father), and Soviet-era activities in propaganda, revealed during litigation initiated by the father against Hettena in the Bulgarian courts.[1] Hettena commented that Zero Hedge has become "a forum for the hateful, conspiracy-driven voices of the angry white men of the alt-right. Racists, anti-Semites, extreme right-wingers, and conspiracy nuts were an underserved audience, and, as it turns out, a profitable one."[1]
In February 2022, intelligence officials from the United States claimed that Zero Hedge has amplified Russian propaganda, stating the site has published articles created by Moscow-controlled media that were then shared by outlets and people unaware of their nexus to Russian intelligence.[82]

 
  • Like
Reactions: IluvdoubleD's
Let's go along with that line of thinking. How much different would it be than right now with politically connected Westerners running rackets and trafficking & criminal operations out of that country as they drain it dry?

Thieves and govt don't like competition?

For starters, they'd be even less able to defend their sovereign territory against an unhinged and bellicose neighbor. Following on to your "thieves and govt" line, theft of territory is fair game is somehow a-ok?

Last I checked, Westerners were not trying to annex Ukraine. Comrade Pooty-Poot is, however.
 
For starters, they'd be even less able to defend their sovereign territory against an unhinged and bellicose neighbor. Following on to your "thieves and govt" line, theft of territory is fair game is somehow a-ok?

Last I checked, Westerners were not trying to annex Ukraine. Comrade Pooty-Poot is, however.
At this point it’s clear that Ras doesn’t actually believe in freedom and he is either psychotic and delusional or his a Russian bot. There’s no other explanation for his kool aid
 
Do you seriously not understand why the President of the USA in his official capacity in a major policy speech openly calling for the removal of a nuclear armed head of state who is currently in a hot war in Eastern Europe is a really stupid thing? That needs to be explained to you?

really-seriously.gif
If you would please explain it to me. I was glad to hear him say it. I'm only disappointed that he may be walking it back. I haven't been near a tv or the internet since yesterday morning.
 
Last edited:
At this point it’s clear that Ras doesn’t actually believe in freedom and he is either psychotic and delusional or his a Russian bot. There’s no other explanation for his kool aid

He is naive and delusional about Russia. He legitimately believes Putin is a legitimate democratically elected leader with broad Russian support. It's odd how Putin has been in power since 1999. His only breaks from power were under his puppet Medvedev. He will remain in power till his death or he is forcefully removed just like Stalin
 
Even tho that is not a verified account, many others are saying the same. My guess is it's the same stuff he hit Navalny with. He likes to put it in tea or coffee.
 
Are they human shields being shot at by Russians or not? Make up your mind
I have no idea because I am not there. Same for you. But I can tell you that there is no incentive for the Russians to shoot them. If they shoot at the humanitarian corridors, then it would discourage people from using them, and thus be detrimental to the purpose of having them. The corridors serve 2 purposes for the Russians, they obviously allow the civilians to escape but it also provides an avenue for soldiers to escape or desert from the other side.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top