War in Ukraine

[VolStrom]

?????????????????????

Luther, did you ever think your life would be so hard once your potato head got installed as president?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

?????????????????????

Vote for the Bolshevik

If he's the nominee, I most certainly will.

 

[BreatheUT]

?????????????????????

You discussed revolution here in the US would be a good thing. It's hard to stomach but it gets better. Aren't those your previous thoughts?

 

[BreatheUT]

You're the man!

 

[luthervol]

So you think Woolworth's prohibiting black customers to it's lunch counter was OK?

Nope. They were discriminating based on race.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Nope. They were discriminating based on race.

What difference does that make? Youtube is discriminating based on an opinion.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Joe and the people behind the curtain want the US in a war. They think it will help them in the midterms and beyond.

 

[Rickyvol77]

What difference does that make? Youtube is discriminating based on an opinion.

Someone doesn’t understand constitutional law yet again

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Joe and the people behind the curtain want the US in a war. They think it will help them in the midterms and beyond.

Apparently, many on the right also want a war. Because of feelz...

 

[luthervol]

Luther, did you ever think your life would be so hard once your potato head got installed as president?

Things have been going relatively well for me and my family. (That is what you asked)
In fact, both of my daughters have gotten promotions/raises in the past month.
My son is doing well in his first year of college - has a campus job that he loves - refereeing intramural sports.
My wife and I are both retiring in a couple of months.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Someone doesn’t understand constitutional law yet again

Spoken by someone from a profession that pizzes on the 4th and 5th Amendment as part of their jobs.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

 

[InVOLuntary]

Apparently, many on the right also want a war. Because of feelz...

Nah.

 

[rocytop2624]

Prevent the majority from winning an election? They screwed up on that one.

Yea because California and New York should choose for everyone who is president.

 

[luthervol]

That was an "anybody but Trump" conversation.
I never waivered from that.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Someone doesn’t understand constitutional law yet again

Also, I never mentioned anything about Youtube policy being unconstitutional...

 

[luthervol]

You discussed revolution here in the US would be a good thing. It's hard to stomach but it gets better. Aren't those your previous thoughts?

I don't remember that discussion or the context.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Spoken by someone from a profession that pizzes on the 4th and 5th Amendment as part of their jobs.

I’ve never pissed on any. But then again I fully understand constitutional law and why private businesses can pretty much do what they want in terms of who they want to deal with and how

 

[luthervol]

What difference does that make? Youtube is discriminating based on an opinion.

lol.....What difference? Really?
I'm good if you guys wish to advocate for some new law regulating the freedoms of private companies.
Currently, YouTube did nothing illegal. Let people boycott YouTube as they did Walgreens; which lead to laws being appropriately changed.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Also, I never mentioned anything about Youtube policy being unconstitutional...

No but you can’t understand why your Woolworth’s example doesn’t compare

 

[Rickyvol77]

What difference does that make? Youtube is discriminating based on an opinion.

So what. I don’t agree with it but they have the right to

 

[luthervol]

Yea because California and New York should choose for everyone who is president.

They don't have anywhere near the majority of votes needed.

 

[Paper_Towel]

And so, the buzz saws of ol' return to cut down the Ruskies

 

[Velo Vol]

Russian generals, in the style of VolNation after losing a recruit, "We didn't want it anyway."

 

[AM64]

So what. I don’t agree with it but they have the right to

Do they, or did they give up that right when YouTube wouldn't have a business without the internet. Thus the basis for my other question. Who owns the internet? I'm thinking it is more a public than private owned entity; which gets to the issue of do you have a right to silence as free speech? Should people be allowed to demonstrate on public property and streets and blast you with information or noise that you don't want to hear and can't easily avoid?