DonjoVol
Sudoku Master
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 6,332
- Likes
- 3,940
Let’s say China starts pumping money into Mexico extremist groups leading to a revolution. The Chinese ambassador is taped directing who the next Mexican president is going to be before there is even a vote to remove the last one. Violence erupts when someone starts shooting from behind protesters, killing police and protesters indiscriminately. After the coup, several violent “ultra nationalists” are given high level government appointments. The children of several high level Chinese officials are given token board seats of Mexican oil companies, paying undeserved tens of millions. The VP of China brags about threatening to cut off aid to Mexico if they continue investigating corruption.
Then China and Mexico start making statements like they’re going to join a Warsaw Pact type alliance. Massive amount of military equipment start flooding into Mexico while tens of thousands American sympathizers are killed along the border. In the near future DoD sees a scenario where Chinese fleets are docked in Mexican ports threatening use of strategic seaways.
Certainly we would try diplomacy, then try regime change- but if everything failed, we’d invade. Especially if China elected an incompetent leader. There’s no way we wouldn’t invoke the Monroe Doctrine.
Sadly, most of our society lives in this weird delusional world our media and politicians create. America has been turned into a sort of Fun House and when you try and show people they are in the Fun House, they lash out.
1. What was Russia willing to give up in their good faith negotiations?
2. Russia wasnt one of the negotiating parties. They were supposed to be the third party mediator. At least that is what they claimed during all the Minsk talks.
3. Going back to 2, Give up all your land or else we have Russia invade your capital, isnt a good faith negotiation for an separatist nation. It clearly points to Russia, not the people of Donbas, having an agenda.
I agree that nationalism is important. The Azov BNs go way beyond nationalism. They’re like Trumpers and ANTIFA on crack.
You seem to hang a lot of importance on Azov being supported by Judaism. In fact, nazis hated many ethnic groups. Poles, Romas, and gypsies were all persecuted. Do you think that this form of persecution is ok because the Jews are on board?
It happened.
Ukrainian rightists burn alive 39 at Odessa union building
Burning Ukraine's Protesters Alive
The only video I could find is not available in my country. Pretty convenient.