Gun control debate (merged)

lol....No you get one vote that you can cast in as many elections as are on that particular ballot. View it as your vote is the gun and the elections on the ballot is the ammunition for that gun. One gun can fire more than once, one vote can be cast more than once.
Also pretty sure you have to vote in the district in which you are registered.
But your vote goes towards national elections. So you are buying a national gun.

And bullets were never part of the equation, scotus has already ruled that they are essential parts of guns and cant be separately banned/restricted. Or at least ammo is still covered by the 2A. So we get the gun and all the ammo that comes with it, that is one vote in one race.

You need a new street cleaner, I need a new shot gun.
You need a new county clerk, that sounds like a new pistol.
That presidential, house, or senate race that effects everyone is clearly on par with a WMD.
Governor is a fully semi automatic 100 clip magazine assault rifle, if you were wondering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL and joevol33

Nope.

Even in "Jim Crow!" states which require ID for voting, you show ID and are in queue to vote immediately. In leftist states, you may undergo no ID scrutiny at all. One party advocates abolishing ID for voting. At least 65 million votes were cast by mail, many to drop boxes that did not conform to law; 15 million ballots simply are unaccounted for; chain of custody was a farce. The constitutional authority of numerous state legislatures were illegally put aside by courts, SoS, governors and election officials, and this WH & Dem congress attempts to illegally make that permanent. Contrary to 'experts' opinion of most safest, securest ever, it was likely the most fraught with illegality and invalidity in our history.

Neither party argues against identification to buy firearms. You literally submit to a background check for each gun purchase which may take 30 minutes to three days. In leftist states and jurisdictions, you may have the additional insult of buying a permit just to take possession of your right and even exercise it; six leftist states requires background checks or permits for ammunition. After bureaucrats who know nothing about firearms have restricted to the type of firearm your 'right' entails and ridiculously limit portability to the politburo or celebrity unless forced by judiciary. Some even render the firearm nearly useless for home defense with storage requirements negating utility. The left - none more than Biden - attempt prohibition via advocating suing manufacturers into bankruptcy for criminal use of the legal, rightful product, and propose punitive taxation of guns and ammo under the petty dictator guise of "well, we ain't taking the right away"; no, just attempting to make it prohibitive to exercise the right. You can't sell or buy firearms via mail. It is imminently easier to vote than own a gun as a felon or former felon.

Bad analogy.
 
lol....No you get one vote that you can cast in as many elections as are on that particular ballot. View it as your vote is the gun and the elections on the ballot is the ammunition for that gun. One gun can fire more than once, one vote can be cast more than once.
Also pretty sure you have to vote in the district in which you are registered.

Lunacy

1647439563361.gif
 
lol....No you get one vote that you can cast in as many elections as are on that particular ballot. View it as your vote is the gun and the elections on the ballot is the ammunition for that gun. One gun can fire more than once, one vote can be cast more than once.
Also pretty sure you have to vote in the district in which you are registered.

Just no, man.

You are voting once in the election period but casting many votes for many candidates on the single ballot. You vote periodically not because your right to vote is limited but because elections are periodic, not impromptu events. The number of votes cast by you is only limited by the number of offices contested and which races you care to participate in.

I can purchase multiple firearms in each single transaction approved by the NICS background check. Because my purchases are impromptu individual exercise of rights not requiring me to launch a political campaign or involve multitudes of people to elect me, I get to purchase guns everyday this week if I wish.
Now you have an apt analogy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Well we haven't had nukes or sarin gas invoked...yet...so there's that.

Funny thing? It's not illegal to own a nuclear weapon. The parts are highly controlled, but one can own it with the proper permits...

And putting up with the constant surveillance and helicopters with armed strike teams orbiting your house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
I am curious about crime stats pre Tennessee open carry vs. open carry.

And before you attack me, I'm not a typical gun control liberal. I'm pretty cool with whatever aside from like a grenade launcher or whatever.
Open carry has literally nothing to do with gun violence especially in Tennessee
 
Funny thing? It's not illegal to own a nuclear weapon. The parts are highly controlled, but one can own it with the proper permits...

And putting up with the constant surveillance and helicopters with armed strike teams orbiting your house.

That is likely going to come off as saying Beetlejuice 3 times.
 
Yes, because regulation of drugs, alcohol and guns has worked so well.

Well, Prohibition is better than no liquor at all - Will Rodgers

You cannot regulate things out of existence. Regulating drugs, firearms, prostitution, gambling, formerly alcohol, ect has little effect on those that choose to get what ever they want, when they want. With regulation you create a black market that thrives and only claims more victims.....sometimes innocent ones due to the gangs that seek to take advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
Advertisement





Back
Top