Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 56,221
- Likes
- 151,174
I'm not sure what to make of this, his long term position in Russia and Europe is becoming a little more untenable every day. Public opinion of him is very low and more of his subjects are becoming emboldened to speak out. I think there's no way out for him at this point.Putin is basically daring other countries to intervene, threatening to resort to nukes. He has to know that no one wins if nukes come into play. His country will not survive. In some ways, I wish someone would call his bluff, in others, I of course worry he just might be serious. But I do think he's bluffing, feigning strength for his people. The last thing he wants is to look weak.
Bullcrap..you can't stop people from risking their lives for the Ukrainian people if they want.I think it gives Putin an excuse to say we are interfering in military activities. I realize that we are not actualy doing so and that it would be a lie to construe it as such, but that is Putin now, isn't it? I just don;t think now is the time to even give him an angle to claim that.
No different than when the left was blaming COVID deaths on Trump. But you had no problem with that.How so? I'm all for the Ukrainians, have been amazed at their resilience and tenacity, and proud of the reactions from people around the globe.
What I find pathetic is that Fox, during this time of unity and almost universal condemnation of Putin, would report about a poll that claims 59% of Americans blame Putin's invasion on Biden.
That is simply sad and pathetic and so many levels. Take a step back and actually think about that.
This aged like milk:
"It’s going to take a hell of a lot of work to make up for all the damage he’s done internationally and nationally," Biden said. "His network of thugs and co-conspirators are going to continue to try to undermine our democracy in the meantime." Imagine what he can do in another year," "Imagine what can happen to Ukraine."
-Biden, 2019
![]()
Also..if he is looking for an "angle" he will just make one up.I think it gives Putin an excuse to say we are interfering in military activities. I realize that we are not actualy doing so and that it would be a lie to construe it as such, but that is Putin now, isn't it? I just don;t think now s the time to even give him an angle to claim that.
Not justified, but it was a gamble that the West and NATO were willing to take rather than move to a more reasonable solution about the status of Ukraine. Ukraine is the one suffering and dealing with these geopolitical games, not any other NATO nation. They don't care about collateral damage, they just want their agenda achieved.I’ve been called a Putin apologist, amongst many other things in these Ukrainian threads. There is/was a lot of behind the scene things that most don’t see through MSM that justified a Putin rebuke..
However, speaking for myself...this isn’t justified. Recognizing the oblasts in Eastern Ukraine, arming them in a geopolitical proxy war against the west in defense is one thing....totally razing the whole country is another. Totally unjustified...
Not justified, but it was a gamble that the West and NATO were willing to take rather than move to a more reasonable solution about the status of Ukraine. Ukraine is the one suffering and dealing with these geopolitical games, not any other NATO nation. They don't care about collateral damage, they just want their agenda achieved.
Iskander?
I dont find it terribly unlikely that there have been special forces out of uniform there already.
Bullcrap..you can't stop people from risking their lives for the Ukrainian people if they want.
IDK, but Putin said flat out he would drop a FOAB on them, and the US was warning everyone he might do it. I'm seeing images of whole towns wiped. Noone can say whats real rn with the info wars, but it does appear that way, and cnn is saying 400 dead civilians. Feel like hitting the bottle yet? because I havent been able to stop.
Ukraine is showing more resolve than any other NATO nation in recent memory, but they set themselves up to have their country devastated when there was a pathway for peace available that could have been achieved long ago.
Sometimes you are a little overzealous in your desire to paint both sides as equal - sometimes they are, sometimes they are close, sometimes they are not close at all...............continuum.No different than when the left was blaming COVID deaths on Trump. But you had no problem with that.
Not justified, but it was a gamble that the West and NATO were willing to take rather than move to a more reasonable solution about the status of Ukraine. Ukraine is the one suffering and dealing with these geopolitical games, not any other NATO nation. They don't care about collateral damage, they just want their agenda achieved.
It wasn't going in that direction until the coup in 2014...At the end of the day this wouldn’t be happening if Ukraine was in NATO and all of this is one of the reasons they wanted in.
Why do you ignore the catalyst for the Crimea annexation? The US State Department destabilized Ukraine in their coup no differently than we did in Libya.Reasonable? I am not sure how much more reasonable the West and Nato could have been. They stood by as Russia annexed Crimea and stood by as Russia invaded regions within Ukraine and setup insurgencies. They stood by as Russia invaded parts of Georgia. What were they supposed to do, give him an independent country and hope that finally made him feel "safe"?
Or, just remained neutral militarily but open for commerce with everyone free of Western limitations and sanctions... and also free of Western vultures coming in and robbing them blind.