President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

You know what I haven't seen? A bunch of dems on here crying that she's a DINO. I have no problem with dems not walking lock step with Biden.
I'm still flabbergasted that republicans were so spineless that they let it become a situation where you either walked in lock step with Trump or you were labeled a RINO and run out of office. Weak.
I've got news for you Luther. Weak-ass liberal Republicans were already referred to as RINO's long before Trump ran for President. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with Trump other than Democrats' 100% round-the-clock fixation on him.
 
Absolutely. There's that old phrase often attributed to Napoleon. "Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself."

Impeaching Biden, even if he and his party of fools may richly deserve, it would just drive a sympathy component in their favor. They are their own worst enemies; let them do their thing.
If he sucks anywhere near as much as did Trump, he will do to the dems in '24 what Trump did to the repubs in '20 - guarantee a presidential loss.

It may get to 25th amendment time; hopefully the dems want drop the ball - like the repubs did.
 
Last edited:
I've got news for you Luther. Weak-ass liberal Republicans were already referred to as RINO's long before Trump ran for President. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with Trump other than Democrats' 100% round-the-clock fixation on him.
They were weak in exactly the same way as is Kyrsten Sinema.

But dummies view one as standing up for what is right and the other as being weak.

I guess you would have to agree that any dem who does not toe the party line is a weak-ass conservative Democrat?
I assume you can see your own hypocrisy.
 
I'm not assuming that. I'm simply saying that a peaceful separation would be the best option for everyone. If the left wants to get aggressive, however, they are out gunned and likely are outnumbered.

Never underestimate the numbers that the kids who are old enough to vote and too young to have figured much out bring to the polls ... apparently that age group extends into the mid 30s for some ... especially if they are drowning in student debt. Of course, if you don't bother to see who is legitimately allowed to vote, that adds another batch. And don't forget the diversities pulled under the big tent. Bribes - promises of free stuff and bailouts and favoritism for votes go a long way, and the dems know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
If he sucks anywhere near as much as did Trump, we will do to the dems in '24 what Trump did to the repubs in '20 - guarantee a presidential loss.

It may get to 25th amendment time; hopefully the dems want drop the ball - like the repubs did.

IF? You say "IF"? Open your eyes, luther.
 
Absolutely. There's that old phrase often attributed to Napoleon. "Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself."

Impeaching Biden, even if he and his party of fools may richly deserve, it would just drive a sympathy component in their favor. They are their own worst enemies; let them do their thing.

The way I look at it..impeach and then impeach.Consume them with scandal, which is real and not some faux Peegate. No compromise or acceptance of an ideology which is counter to what this nation founded. We already passed the point of reconciliation. The next R President, if ever with these MIB's, will face the same. That ballot harvesting killed our republic, not 1/6 or impeachments
 
Kyrsten Sinema Tells Chuck Schumer to Pound Sand and Leaves Democrats With Nowhere to Go

What exactly is Chuck Schumer doing? That’s the big question that’s emerged in light of his push to hold a vote on blowing up the filibuster. Ostensibly, he’s doing so in order to pass “voting rights” and save our “democracy” by having the federal government rig the 2022 election. But is that really his plan here?

I ask that because it’s been obvious since his “dear colleagues” letter was released that he doesn’t have the votes. Last night, Joe Manchin said he’s not on board. Now, Kyrsten Sinema has weighed in, letting it be known that her position hasn’t changed. She’s still against any maneuver that would eliminate the 60-vote threshold to pass any type of legislation.



Kyrsten Sinema Tells Chuck Schumer to Pound Sand and Leaves Democrats With Nowhere to Go


Good for Sinema - we need more rebels, and the number to pass legislation should be more in the 2/3 to 3/4 range anyway. Stalemate would be far better than what congress does to us daily. Joe's executive orders should require a 3/4 majority, too; and I don't think he's got the functioning brain cells to get to 3/4 capacity on any day.
 
They were weak in exactly the same way as is Kyrsten Sinema.

But dummies view one as standing up for what is right and the other as being weak.

I guess you would have to agree that any dem who does not toe the party line is a weak-ass conservative Democrat?
I assume you can see your own hypocrisy.
Sinema is your problem. I don't give a damn what you leftist loonies do with her. I plan to replace her with her a Republican in her next election. Since I'm a resident of Arizona, I get the great pleasure of helping that plan come to fruition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and AM64
Good for Sinema - we need more rebels, and the number to pass legislation should be more in the 2/3 to 3/4 range anyway. Stalemate would be far better than what congress does to us daily. Joe's executive orders should require a 3/4 majority, too; and I don't think he's got the functioning brain cells to get to 3/4 capacity on any day.
Bypassing Congress by legislating through executive orders is unconstitutional and should be abolished. I said the same thing when Trump and other Republicans used them too.
 
Sinema is your problem. I don't give a damn what you leftist loonies do with her. I plan to replace her with her a Republican in the next election.
A trumplican or a rino?
So you do see your hypocrisy. It's a little cringe worthy isn't it?
 
Bypassing Congress by legislating through executive orders is unconstitutional and should be abolished. I said the same thing when Trump and other Republicans used them too.

I have mixed feelings about that for a couple of reasons. One is that a president without authority is a figurehead - imagine a company run by a CEO without the ability to set policy. The other is that while congress is the legitimate legislative body, it has overstepped bounds. The president as the chief executive (or CEO) should have the budget and a broad mandate to manage, and congress has often taken away that power. Budgets should normally be not to exceed guidelines rather than must spend dictates.

As an example (perhaps not a great one), congress allocated money to Ukraine and Trump threatened to withhold it. While it may be argued that particular instance was a political act, what if Ukraine had decided to use the funds to attack a neighbor or use funding intended for peaceful purposes as a means to build an offensive arsenal and immediate action was required to freeze the funds? You are right executive orders should not be legislation, but by the same token legislation shouldn't be binding resolutions on how the executive executes the details.
 
A trumplican or a rino?
So you do see your hypocrisy. It's a little cringe worthy isn't it?
There is no hypocrisy in my statements at all. Republican issues are mine to handle. Socialist issues are yours to handle. However, I plan to help you resolve this particular issue by replacing her with a Republican in 2024.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
There is no hypocrisy in my statements at all. Republican issues are mine to handle. Socialist issues are yours to handle. However, I plan to help you resolve this particular issue by replacing her with a Republican in 2024.
Hypocrisy in action is fascinating to behold.

It's like playing peek a boo with a baby. But they eventually learn that even if they pretend not to see you, you're still there.
 
Last edited:
Hypocrisy in action is fascinating to behold.

It's like paying peek a boo with a baby. But they eventually learn that even if they pretend not to see you, you're still there.
The only hypocritical thing that I've done is suggest to other conservatives on this board not to feed the socialist trolls. Yet here I am conversing with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
The only hypocritical thing that I've done is suggest to other conservatives on this board not to feed the socialist trolls. Yet here I am conversing with you.
That's not the only thing.
Standing up against your own party --- weak-ass or heroic?
I expect no answer.
 
You know what I haven't seen? A bunch of dems on here crying that she's a DINO. I have no problem with dems not walking lock step with Biden.
I'm still flabbergasted that republicans were so spineless that they let it become a situation where you either walked in lock step with Trump or you were labeled a RINO and run out of office. Weak.
Are you insane. Go check up on what Dems are doing and saying to Manchin and her
 
Another Aide Abandons Kamala Harris Amid Even More Claims of Bullying

2e47e4a9-018a-494b-ba52-e60c0a2d3a70-860x475.jpg


Another day, another member of Vice-President Kamala Harris’s staff runs for the door as more stories of toxic work environments and bullying abound.

According to CNBC, deputy director of public engagement for Harris, Vincent Evans, has decided enough was enough and left Harris’s team in order to take a top spot in the Congressional Black Caucus.

Another Aide Abandons Kamala Harris Amid Even More Claims of Bullying

E6E24926-AF7A-4B30-B53B-E2C608CF8807.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
Another Aide Abandons Kamala Harris Amid Even More Claims of Bullying

2e47e4a9-018a-494b-ba52-e60c0a2d3a70-860x475.jpg


Another day, another member of Vice-President Kamala Harris’s staff runs for the door as more stories of toxic work environments and bullying abound.

According to CNBC, deputy director of public engagement for Harris, Vincent Evans, has decided enough was enough and left Harris’s team in order to take a top spot in the Congressional Black Caucus.

Another Aide Abandons Kamala Harris Amid Even More Claims of Bullying
It's kind of like people haven't met these "strong", "powerful" women that think being a good leader means crapping all over everyone and banging your way to the top.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top