Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#112,952
#112,952
allvol123 said:
I have no opinion on Rogan or this doctor in regards to their Covid beliefs. But this kind of behavior by tech does the opposite of what they supposedly want.
Click to expand...

Rogan is now on Spotify as is his interview with Dr Peter McCullough. Spotify app is free and the interview is very interesting. McCullough has been thrown under the bus for speaking out despite his impeccable credentials. What those responsible for censoring him won’t do is accept his repeated challenges/requests to sit down, person to person and discuss/debate the virus, the need for multi-drug therapeutics and the known problems with the vaccine. NOT ONE other expert, MD, virologist or epidemiologist has accepted his invitation either. Not one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassmaster_Vol, whodeycin85 and allvol123
#112,954
#112,954
Vol737 said:
Rogan is now on Spotify as is his interview with Dr Peter McCullough. Spotify app is free and the interview is very interesting. McCullough has been thrown under the bus for speaking out despite his impeccable credentials. What those responsible for censoring him won’t do is accept his repeated challenges/requests to sit down, person to person and discuss/debate the virus, the need for multi-drug therapeutics and the known problems with the vaccine. NOT ONE other expert, MD, virologist or epidemiologist has accepted his invitation either. Not one.
Click to expand...

Having a restraining order placed on you by Baylor Hospital Systems because you continue to use their name and likeness is definitely impeccable.

Even Joe gets visibly/audibly frustrated with him over an item that is so easily debunked.

It's a bunch of people clawing for limelight instead of doing the actual work.
 
#112,955
#112,955
I have several issues with McCullough's opinions, but I do think his ideas on early treatment are important.

Malone is not the same, at all. I don't think anything he has actually said is controversial. It's a very objective interview.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and Bassmaster_Vol
#112,956
#112,956
kiddiedoc said:
I have several issues with McCullough's opinions, but I do think his ideas on early treatment are important.

Malone is not the same, at all. I don't think anything he has actually said is controversial. It's a very objective interview.
Click to expand...

McCullough's discussion on betadine nasal rinse made solid sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#112,963
#112,963
AshG said:
Having a restraining order placed on you by Baylor Hospital Systems because you continue to use their name and likeness is definitely impeccable.

Even Joe gets visibly/audibly frustrated with him over an item that is so easily debunked.

It's a bunch of people clawing for limelight instead of doing the actual work.
Click to expand...

He explains that in the interview and he did in fact work for Baylor Hospital systems, something they cannot prevent him from using on his CV. Their issue as I understood it was they wanted it delineated that he no longer worked for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#112,964
#112,964
Vol737 said:
He explains that in the interview and he did in fact work for Baylor Hospital systems, something they cannot prevent him from using on his CV. Their issue as I understood it was they wanted it delineated that he no longer worked for them.
Click to expand...

He did, yes. But he kept claiming them as primary after his departure.

If you want to understand why Baylor is so adamant about this, check out the podcast Dr. Death, season 1. They almost found themselves sued out of existence because of another doctor.

It would be like me going around with Grand Valley State on my letterhead, even though I haven't worked there in two years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
#112,965
#112,965
AshG said:
He did, yes. But he kept claiming them as primary after his departure.

If you want to understand why Baylor is so adamant about this, check out the podcast Dr. Death, season 1. They almost found themselves sued out of existence because of another doctor.

It would be like me going around with Grand Valley State on my letterhead, even though I haven't worked there in two years.
Click to expand...

I’ll check it out. Thanks. And that’s Baylor’s prerogative, which is fine. What you highlighted in that though, is that Baylor’s response to him wasn’t because of what he was saying wrt the virus/vaccine/treatments, but was driven from a legal standpoint out of their own fear from a prior incident, but not necessarily because they thought his understanding and views on the issue to be incorrect. They quite possibly feared their substantial funding from the NIH could be jeopardized as well if they did not publicly distance themselves from an unwelcome narrative that challenges the NIH positions. Again, I would really appreciate someone in this field, with his credentials and maybe published as much as Dr McCullough has been throughout his career, to actually sit down and have that discussion and challenge his research and positions on all of this. As of yet, no one will.
 
#112,966
#112,966
Vol737 said:
I’ll check it out. Thanks. And that’s Baylor’s prerogative, which is fine. What you highlighted in that though, is that Baylor’s response to him wasn’t because of what he was saying wrt the virus/vaccine/treatments, but was driven from a legal standpoint out of their own fear from a prior incident, but not necessarily because they thought his understanding and views on the issue to be incorrect. They quite possibly feared their substantial funding from the NIH could be jeopardized as well if they did not publicly distance themselves from an unwelcome narrative that challenges the NIH positions. Again, I would really appreciate someone in this field, with his credentials and maybe published as much as Dr McCullough has been throughout his career, to actually sit down and have that discussion and challenge his research and positions on all of this. As of yet, no one will.
Click to expand...
Exactly. They don't address any of the claims by these doctors... they just resort to ad hominem attacks or some other attack that has nothing to do with what he is saying about the vaccines and COVID treatments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
#112,971
#112,971
AdoptedVOL said:
I just learned my daughters hospital is requiring nurses that are infected with Covid to still come to work.

Guess it’s OK for me to go out to a movie, grab a beer, and live life.

Just crazy.
Click to expand...
We are required to still work even with mild symptoms. A triple vaxxed Co worker is now off work because she has serious symptoms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey and Rasputin_Vol
#112,973
#112,973
AdoptedVOL said:
I just learned my daughters hospital is requiring nurses that are infected with Covid to still come to work.

Guess it’s OK for me to go out to a movie, grab a beer, and live life.

Just crazy.
Click to expand...
So we have hospitals firing the unvaccinated and others (or maybe the same hospitals) demanding people with COVID work. LOL...

Clown show
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb, NorthDallas40, Matt2496 and 11 others
#112,974
#112,974
kiddiedoc said:
Malone says the two hills he will die on are stopping the jabs in children and fighting the erosion of free speech.
Click to expand...
I’d be happy with it being the parents decision and the free speech.
I would not vaccinate my children for this. Never gave them the flu vaccine either even though I took it every year. Anyone looking at the stats objectively would have to think long and hard about it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top