Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

I'm curious why you keep attacking my critiques of he judge when it is the same problem I have.


I'm not attacking them. I'm asking you to put them in context of other bad behavior in the trial. Presumably the critiques are based in some presumed potential for biasing the jury.

I've asked repeatedly and even given you my evaluation but every time I ask you there's some deflection.

If you don't want to answer it just say so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
I'm not attacking them. I'm asking you to put them in context of other bad behavior in the trial. Presumably the critiques are based in some presumed potential for biasing the jury.

I've asked repeatedly and even given you my evaluation but every time I ask you there's some deflection.

If you don't want to answer it just say so.
I dont subscribe to the the "somebody did something bad, therefore we should ignore something somebody else did," theory. Even so, I'm pretty sure I sad the prosecutor not calling out Rittenhouse for exercising 5th amendment doesn't fly either. What do I need to call out to gain message board cred to mention the judge in this trial?
 
I dont subscribe to the the "somebody did something bad, therefore we should ignore something somebody else did," theory. Even so, I'm pretty sure I sad the prosecutor not calling out Rittenhouse for exercising 5th amendment doesn't fly either. What do I need to call out to gain message board cred to mention the judge in this trial?

Nothing I've said matches the thing you don't subscribe to.

Seems you are incapable or unwilling to compare the two instances. I find that odd but I'm sure the response will be yet another non-answer so I'll leave it at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
Nothing I've said matches the thing you don't subscribe to.

Seems you are incapable or unwilling to compare the two instances. I find that odd but I'm sure the response will be yet another non-answer so I'll leave it at that.
Honestly, I'm not sure what we're arguing about at this point.
 
It’s largely irrelevant.
Not sure why you’re beating this drum.
I will always side with respect for those who paid the price to keep us free. It has absolutely positively zero impact on this trial.
If you go back and read my posts its not this trial I'm concerned about, it shouldn't be happening in general.
 
on the contrary I think it should happen in every court in the country on Veterans Day.
Agree to disagree.
We're gonna have to. I'm in no means denigrating anyone's service (i will be and have been accused of it because of my take on this and that hurts) but being a vet shouldn't afford anyone special status in front of jury, no matter which side that vet is testifying for.
 
We're gonna have to. I'm in no means denigrating anyone's service (i will be and have been accused of it because of my take on this and that hurts) but being a vet shouldn't afford anyone special status in front of jury, no matter which side that vet is testifying for.
They weren’t
Everyone who served was acknowledged. On Veterans Day, as they should have been.
Edit: you’re attaching meaning to the acknowledgment that just isn’t there.
 
They weren’t
Everyone who served was acknowledged. On Veterans Day, as they should have been.
Edit: you’re attaching meaning to the acknowledgment that just isn’t there.
I'm attaching meaning to the fact the judge acknowledged anybody. He should have kept his mouth shut. We're not going to agree on this.

Edit: for me this isn't about Rittenhouse, his guilt, his innocence, or anything to do with those things. I just think the judge was wrong to do what he did. It may piss people off, but I'll stick with it.
 
Last edited:
I doubt that's how it is in your working world, but its definitely how you guys come across with any non-engineer that has to deal with you. I dont mean that as an insult, but you know what I'm talking about. Especially with message boards. [Sunglasses emoji]
I’ll freely admit engineers aren’t “normal”. Our brains just process the world differently it’s how we are put together largely and then refined by training. It’s both a creative and mathematical/analytical profession especially on the design side.

“The Knack” from Dilbert is very very real.
 
He should stop. Doesn't matter if you're pro-Rittenhouse or anti-Rittenhouse.
People are pro or anti-Rittenhouse? Why? The trial should be about whether or not he acted in self-defense. If I understand correctly, the FBI tapes paint a fairly clear picture it was self-defense. It's a shame so many want this trial to be a political event rather than a legal proceeding.
 
People are pro or anti-Rittenhouse? Why? The trial should be about whether or not he acted in self-defense. If I understand correctly, the FBI tapes paint a fairly clear picture it was self-defense. It's a shame so many want this trial to be a political event rather than a legal proceeding.
Are you saying I want this to be a political event?
 
You replied to me so I made an assumption. Sorry if it was inaccurate.
I replied to you because you said people were pro or anti-Rittenhouse. It's not about Rittenhouse. It's not whether you like him or what he did. It's about whether he broke the law, and/or what laws he broke. It doesn't look like murder IMO, but maybe they can get him on a weapons charge? No idea what the law on that is. But it appears he did indeed act in self-defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tnmarktx
Advertisement

Back
Top