volsknx
The only people who dislike winners are losers!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2021
- Messages
- 744
- Likes
- 1,015
But that isn't what I said, obviously some States are limiting or regulating them for some unknown reason which could be a regulatory taking(?). I think you should pay more attention when in the forum.
BTW on another subject LSU is already advertising in a big way. All the way up to New York Time Square. LOL

I think the NCAA is opening up the floodgates to endorsements and hoping the kids will take this and be happy. But I don’t believe this alone is what SCOTUS had in mind with their ruling. They did not mention NIL directly. My opinion of what they were trying to get at sounded more like a profit sharing type situation. There will be a conversation about a bigger piece of the pie at some point.“NCAA rules that prevent schools from paying players directly remain intact. The board directed schools to make sure that payments to athletes are not expressly for their athletic achievements and to ensure that no payments are used as recruiting inducements.”
Sorry but the NCAA and their power to enforce rules are still intact. This is a mine field everyone still has to navigate…
Some have argued that NIL just makes the rich richer but I’m not so sure. It’s going to be harder for Saban to convince a 5 star to come to Bama and sit the bench till their junior year when they could get on the field somewhere else as a freshman and start making money. Those car dealerships in Birmingham aren’t going to sign the 4th string QB no one knows to endorse them. They will want the starter.This is going to hurt Bama in the long run more than it’s gonna hurt anybody else.
