President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

A few of us are anti tariff. I wonder if those who are pro Trump tariff are pro Joe tariff?
If he is really doing them, I am absolutely pro tariff. If AAPL/NKE/(whatever corporation uses cheap Chinese labor) feels it in the pocket then they will move those sweatshops to Vietnam. Trump was 100% spot on in this tactic. He just didn't sell it very well.

I don't think HoJoe will do that to their biggest donors though
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
If he is really doing them, I am absolutely pro tariff. If AAPL/NKE/(whatever corporation uses cheap Chinese labor) feels it in the pocket then they will move those sweatshops to Vietnam. Trump was 100% spot on in this tactic. He just didn't sell it very well.

I don't think HoJoe will do that to their biggest donors though

What's the difference (if there is any) between increased prices to consumers because of tariffs and increased prices to consumers because of doubling the minimum wage?
 
You clearly don't understand the 2A
lol.....I've seen the "2A crowd" make this comment countless times....."why don't they just enforce the laws that are in place?"

Now you're telling me that you cannot enforce the law if the person doesn't agree with the law???????

Seems you guys are trying to have your cake and eat it too.
 
lol.....I've seen the "2A crowd" make this comment countless times....."why don't they just enforce the laws that are in place?"

Now you're telling me that you cannot enforce the law if the person doesn't agree with the law???????

Seems you guys are trying to have your cake and eat it too.
first, this law isn't in place

I'm saying the 2A was put in place for a very specific reason. There is no justification for the govt to be allowed to violate that

I get that as a lawyer you're not concerned with economics, science, math, etc but shouldn't you at least have a basic understanding of the US Constitution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ttucke11
first, this law isn't in place

I'm saying the 2A was put in place for a very specific reason. There is no justification for the govt to be allowed to violate that

I get that as a lawyer you're not concerned with economics, science, math, etc but shouldn't you at least have a basic understanding of the US Constitution?
Luth isn't a lawyer, he's a PE teacher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and AM64
first, this law isn't in place

I'm saying the 2A was put in place for a very specific reason. There is no justification for the govt to be allowed to violate that

I get that as a lawyer you're not concerned with economics, science, math, etc but shouldn't you at least have a basic understanding of the US Constitution?
Are the laws that are currently in place Constitutional?
 
Being feared is not the opposite of being loved; that would be being hated or despised.
There's a big difference between being feared and being despised.
Do you even understand the crap spout out on here? I’ve never loved something I was afraid of. It’s the total opposite. Quit trolling like a dumba$$
 
It's not rude for her to not return a salute. What I can't figure out is why they are saluting her.

As you've pointed out earlier, she is neither entitled to give or receive a salute. While there are new rules allowing vets to salute during the national anthem, I see absolutely nothing requiring that military members salute civilians, and it's sketchy about saluting even superiors not in uniform. I suppose there's nothing that prohibits a civilian (non veteran specifically) from rendering a salute, but it's disrespectful to the military to do so ... at least in my opinion - they didn't earn the right.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top