Gun control debate (merged)

Because it's like comparing apples to garage doors?

You asked a stupid question about why gun owners hate unions. Didn't really get the answer you were looking for and the thread drifted. Conversation turned into a discussion on unions that's probably worthy of its own thread minus the gun owner question.

The two are completely unrelated...
At least he’s consistent on making stupid ass comparisons and then claiming victory when we all say “damn that’s a stupid ass comparison I’m not going to waste the time responding to give credence to stupid ass comparisons”
 
Because it's like comparing apples to garage doors?

You asked a stupid question about why gun owners hate unions. Didn't really get the answer you were looking for and the thread drifted. Conversation turned into a discussion on unions that's probably worthy of its own thread minus the gun owner question.

The two are completely unrelated...
Actually, I expected evasion of the question because it points out hypocrisy which nobody likes to own up to... and that’s exactly what I got.
 
And for the last time (if you can't be bothered to answer then I don't want to hear a word about anybody owing you anything in the way of explanation) are you greenlighting the threat/use of deadly force against civilian employers as a viable means of negotiation?
No, when did I do that?
 
LOL How do you do that? Have you ever been around any scabs? Their life at work sucks from the moment they cross a picket line. I am not saying at all that I condone the activity/treatment, but no one in their right mind crosses a picket line.
Sure it is. My point (especially in right to work states) is that if you don’t want to participate in a union, that’s fine. Don’t participate in the organization or any benefits it might garner.
 
I didn't stutter. You seem to have an issue with non-union workers having the same working conditions as the union employees. Do you think the non-union guys should work in a more dangerous work environment?
No. Do you think a non-union worker or union worker has better ability to affect the necessary change?
 
Can someone take OH’s stupid ass to a new thread instead of cluttering this one with his jibberish? If there’s any new firearm news we’d never no thanks to his grandstanding.
Lol I’m sure you’ll let us know about anything earth shattering.
 
No, when did I do that?

Excellent, so we'll call it a no. And here's where that terrible conflation comes into play. The 2A of course is EXACTLY concerned with armed citizens and the threat/use of lethal force in sorting out, with no exaggeration, the most dire of circumstances.

Meanwhile you roll in here and try to sell the idea that if the light is just right and you tilt your head correctly and squint really, really hard you can, with a straight face, draw comparisons with some people having employment dissatisfaction issues.

No... just no.

I'm not going to wizz on your entire union conversation since, as Grand pointed out, it isn't as though there isn't a conversation to be had but it's silly to try and put it in this thread and invoking the 2A.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
What is that bit in the 2A about “well regulated militia?” Doesn’t sound like it is geared toward the individual at all. Plus a right, as it were, applies to the masses as a protection to the collective citizenry... you know, the whole reasoning behind establishing the 2nd amendment in the first place.

Is Luther under a different name...?
 
Sure it is. My point (especially in right to work states) is that if you don’t want to participate in a union, that’s fine. Don’t participate in the organization or any benefits it might garner.
How does that work exactly? If a union negotiates pay/benefits, are those non-union workers excluded from those benefits? I'm guessing not. So they benefit from the collective bargaining and don't have to pay for it. How nice.
 
How does that work exactly? If a union negotiates pay/benefits, are those non-union workers excluded from those benefits? I'm guessing not. So they benefit from the collective bargaining and don't have to pay for it. How nice.

Take it to a new ****ing thread for crying out loud...
 
How does that work exactly? If a union negotiates pay/benefits, are those non-union workers excluded from those benefits? I'm guessing not. So they benefit from the collective bargaining and don't have to pay for it. How nice.
Not if my union is drawing up the contract.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top