C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 33,711
- Likes
- 58,907
At least he’s consistent on making stupid ass comparisons and then claiming victory when we all say “damn that’s a stupid ass comparison I’m not going to waste the time responding to give credence to stupid ass comparisons”Because it's like comparing apples to garage doors?
You asked a stupid question about why gun owners hate unions. Didn't really get the answer you were looking for and the thread drifted. Conversation turned into a discussion on unions that's probably worthy of its own thread minus the gun owner question.
The two are completely unrelated...
Actually, I expected evasion of the question because it points out hypocrisy which nobody likes to own up to... and that’s exactly what I got.Because it's like comparing apples to garage doors?
You asked a stupid question about why gun owners hate unions. Didn't really get the answer you were looking for and the thread drifted. Conversation turned into a discussion on unions that's probably worthy of its own thread minus the gun owner question.
The two are completely unrelated...
Sure it is. My point (especially in right to work states) is that if you don’t want to participate in a union, that’s fine. Don’t participate in the organization or any benefits it might garner.LOL How do you do that? Have you ever been around any scabs? Their life at work sucks from the moment they cross a picket line. I am not saying at all that I condone the activity/treatment, but no one in their right mind crosses a picket line.
No. Do you think a non-union worker or union worker has better ability to affect the necessary change?I didn't stutter. You seem to have an issue with non-union workers having the same working conditions as the union employees. Do you think the non-union guys should work in a more dangerous work environment?
No, when did I do that?
What is that bit in the 2A about “well regulated militia?” Doesn’t sound like it is geared toward the individual at all. Plus a right, as it were, applies to the masses as a protection to the collective citizenry... you know, the whole reasoning behind establishing the 2nd amendment in the first place.
How does that work exactly? If a union negotiates pay/benefits, are those non-union workers excluded from those benefits? I'm guessing not. So they benefit from the collective bargaining and don't have to pay for it. How nice.Sure it is. My point (especially in right to work states) is that if you don’t want to participate in a union, that’s fine. Don’t participate in the organization or any benefits it might garner.
