butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 103,428
- Likes
- 208,308
You missed the point clearly
DCs aren’t judged on wins and losses. There are judged by their side of the balls stats.
Washington could be our DC and we win 9-10 games in the next few years and with our offensive scheme his stats would still suck and thus he “failed”
that’s why the DC job here being a “success” is about as likely as the vandy HC winning
It's not Jimmy's job to withhold information. As a matter of fact it's his job not to withhold information. The ones responsible for any leaks are within the UT system. They're the ones DW would like to identify.People should flood the WNML site with demands to fire Jimmy. Start a petition. Something. The guy is a cancer to UT sports IMO.
I hear what you're saying but the last two DCs under Mike Leach have been hot DC names so I don't really know if this is a point you can count on.
I won't sell them to you individually, but as a unit. CJH's offenses produced over 500 yards a game at UCF and this was the staff that did that with him. They speak the same language, they know how to coach the techniques, and they know how to deal with one another on the day to day. I wouldn't mess with that chemistry.
He didn't bring them in for budget, he brought them in because he's comfortable with them and they give him the highest probability of success. Personally, I'm excited to see what they can do with these young men.
You know what I want to see? A WR catch a pass in stride in the middle of the field with a chance to score. Don't think I've seen that in a while.
No doubt those 2 guys have made a name for themselves especially the one at OU.
I just see the odds being much higher for a DC in this offense. That’s why I mentioned vandy as the odds are really high. Franklin made it work but he wasn’t at a hot shot program and had to take a gamble. Washington will have better DC offers in the next few years with better odds of success imo