K-town Vol Fan
Blood Runneth Orange
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2005
- Messages
- 18,216
- Likes
- 24,939
Where did you hear that?playing CFB Revamped on my PC (with help from RPCS3) and enjoying it. True to form, even though Guarantano is better rated, his in game performance is always worse than when I use the other QBs.
I heard the new game would not allow for edited rosters and will be locked down to prevent modding, which kind of turns me off to it.
college-football-faq-heres-what-to-know-so-farWhere did you hear that?
Thanks for the link. Good stuff. They better figure out a way to get roster share in there. It’s ridiculous that they wouldn’t find a way. Hopefully the NIL stuff will be sorted out.college-football-faq-heres-what-to-know-so-far
a bit long but lots of good info
Great read. I’ll take it.college-football-faq-heres-what-to-know-so-far
a bit long but lots of good info
I don’t try to invent more reasons to dislike Notre Dame, but they just keep giving them to me.
Notre Dame will not participate in college football video game until new NIL rules are established
Notre Dame believes that college athletes should be able to benefit from the use of their likenesses in the video game.
Thing is, so far it seems like it won’t be there likeness. Even limiting the community’s ability to edit players and rosters for teams when it comes out. Of course that’s what they are saying for now, if stuff with the NIL gets worked out maybe that will change.
Notre Dame will not participate in college football video game until new NIL rules are established
Notre Dame believes that college athletes should be able to benefit from the use of their likenesses in the video game.
I miss the days when just being in a video game was cool enough for the players to be happy.Thing is, so far it seems like it won’t be there likeness. Even limiting the community’s ability to edit players and rosters for teams when it comes out. Of course that’s what they are saying for now, if stuff with the NIL gets worked out maybe that will change.
I think EA stays away from player names and likeness even if players can get paid for name and likeness.Well you think about what each player could demand for their likeness.. maybe the huge stars get okay paydays but every other player gets what? $10 which they will then spend that and 60 more to purchase the game with them in it?
Same, dynasty was by far the best part. They could get really in depth with it now with hiring multiple coaches, recruiting, transfer portals. I won’t hold my breath that they will though. Although it would be nice to at least customize the roster, but looks like we won’t be able to do that either.Honestly, may favorite part of the game was always getting 7, 8, 20 years deep in a dynasty. By that point its all random generated players anyways. I really don't care if the base roster is real players or not.
I agree, but I like to have the current rosters for a starting point with a dynasty and to see where the coaching carousel goes. I also like to play exhibition games to see our current Vols team play in Columbus or against other tough teams.Honestly, may favorite part of the game was always getting 7, 8, 20 years deep in a dynasty. By that point its all random generated players anyways. I really don't care if the base roster is real players or not.
I think EA stays away from player names and likeness even if players can get paid for name and likeness.
Who does the EA negotiate with or get approval for compensation? Each individual player? They have no agents (currently). They have no players union negotiating on their behalf.
This would be ideal and you would think would let them focus more of their time on gameplay as well. Although, it’s been said that allowing customizable rosters might open up potential legal issues and one of the reasons for the agreement to bring back the game was that players wouldn’t be able to custom the roster and make the players the likeness of the athletes. Don’t really understand how something one of us were to create ourselves for personal use would be open to legal action, but it seems like it may of been part of the agreement.Yeah I don't get why player likeness is even an issue with this game. Just release it with " 6'0 200lbs generic white guy" and " 6'0 200lbs generic black guy" rosters and let the players customize them from there. We already do that anyway. I don't need the game to ship with completely accurate rosters with 1:1 player names and attributes. I'm baffled why player compensation over likeness is even on the table here when it's so easily avoidable.
This would be ideal and you would think would let them focus more of their time on gameplay as well. Although, it’s been said that allowing customizable rosters might open up potential legal issues and one of the reasons for the agreement to bring back the game was that players wouldn’t be able to custom the roster and make the players the likeness of the athletes. Don’t really understand how something one of us were to create ourselves for personal use would be open to legal action, but it seems like it may of been part of the agreement.
I agree completely, but I feel like I read somewhere that part of the agreement between the organization that holds most of the licenses and EA was that you couldn’t customize players to look like the college athletes. If that is actually true, idk.As long as no one is profiting from it, I don't see what anyone could do about it. It would be one thing if custom rosters were being sold but they aren't.