delfonic
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 3,123
- Likes
- 7,427
Of course you are. good grief cat get a new shtick. This one is old and tired.I'm worried about pass protection
2017 sacks allowed at UCF (pre Elarbee): 5th
2018 sacks allowed: 23rd
2019 sacks allowed: 53rd
2020 sacks allowed: 76th
He made it clear that very few teams run a true base defense. Would you say we ran a 3-4 last year. What percentage of plays did we go out of a 3-4? You read what you wanted to read out of his post.Uh no
The only schools he named were schools that ran the 3-3-5 in their Nickel defense packages. That doesn’t tell me anything about schools that run it as their base defense. Not even close sorry
@vols 30 gonna love this one
Seriously, we need OL. At this point, I think it's worth a flyer and see how he develops.
Welcome, Jeremiah!!
I get that but here is the way I see a base 3-3-5 vs the teams he mentioned that play a 3-3-5 in certain passing downs when they are in the nickel
The team that plays the 4-3 or even the 3-4 just replace a LB with a 5th DB when it’s a passing down and they want to play the nickel. That’s what we see with Georgia, Bama and LSU that @HankHill mentioned
it’s my assumption the base 3-3-5 would keep the same personale on the field more and thus requires that 5th DB to be more Versatile being able to be a run stopper and good in pass coverages. So as you say that hybrid player is very important.
He made it clear that very few teams run a true base defense. Would you say we ran a 3-4 last year. What percentage of plays did we go out of a 3-4? You read what you wanted to read out of his post.
Very reasonable. I am with you for this year. Probably will argue with you about some high three stars next yearI didn't really expect to land any new names. Not going to complain about stars or offer lists. He's only been on the job for a week.
But his recruiting motto for 2022 better be -
4 and 5 star only or GTFO
Well that was my main point. There’s no such thing really as a 3-4 or 4-3 base anymore because that’s not what you’re in the majority of time. So why don’t we call teams sub packages their base when they are in it the majority of time?
At the end of the day we just have to play the defense that best suits our current roster each year Bc unlike the nfl you’re not gonna have these fixtures for 4-8 years on defenses to really build around.
To sum up my view on all of it.... you can always match the offense when they go heavy when the time comes. It’s way more important to sure up your sub package and let that be your go to defense.
please tell me this isnt the name? we HAVE a DC right now, on campus.
Texas 2019 defense: Gave up 28.9 ppg
Texas 2020 defense: Gave up 28.5 ppg
I don’t think I’d call 2019 “bottoming out” and then say Ash had a good 1st year