Democrats plan to introduce articles of impeachment as early as Monday

#401
#401
luthervol said:
All opposing views do not deserve to be treated equally and respectfully.
But that certainly works both ways.
Look at the lack of respect given to people who support a woman's right to choose.
They're labeled baby killers.
Look at the lack of respect given to people who support BLM.
They're called Marxist terrorist.
It goes on and on....don't act like it's one sided.
Click to expand...
Anyone who was in DC this week was labeled an insurrectionist or seditionist. The sad and scary part is you don't seem to care. You seem at peace with shutting down one side as long as your team "wins." We need less of you on both sides. Unfortunately we are just getting more
 
  • Like
Reactions: C1500
#403
#403
utvolpj said:
By supporting a party that wants to silence dissent? Wow, either some top level trolling or...
Click to expand...
lol....No one is trying to silence dissent. That's an absurd proposition.
They are silencing harmful and dangerous propaganda (known lies)
 
#404
#404
GSD82 said:
That's a damn lie. No one ever said go storm the Capitol. They did rally to object to the cheating.
Click to expand...
It's pretty clear what he wanted. But I'm sure you also believe quotes like "trial by combat" and "you'll never take the country back with weakness" to an angry, delusional mob weren't meant to incite violence, either.
 
#405
#405
utvolpj said:
Anyone who was in DC this week was labeled an insurrectionist or seditionist. The dad and scary part is you don't seem to care. You seem at peace with shutting down one side as long as your team "wins." We need less of you on both sides. Unfortunately we are just getting more
Click to expand...
I've said repeatedly that 93% of the protestors were perfectly within their rights and doing nothing at all wrong.
Don't know how you missed that.
 
#407
#407
tvolsfan said:
It's pretty clear what he wanted. But I'm sure you also believe quotes like "trial by combat" and "you'll never take the country back with weakness" to an angry, delusional mob weren't meant to incite violence, either.
Click to expand...
He never said to be violent or to go into the Capitol. He even told them to knock it off. Which is a yuuuge difference from your vp and others who pushed for riots
 
#409
#409
GSD82 said:
He never said to be violent or to go into the Capitol. He even told them to knock it off. Which is a yuuuge difference from your vp and others who pushed for riots
Click to expand...
He told them to knock it off when it was clear he may be in trouble.
 
#410
#410
luthervol said:
All opposing views do not deserve to be treated equally and respectfully.
But that certainly works both ways.
Look at the lack of respect given to people who support a woman's right to choose.
They're labeled baby killers.
Look at the lack of respect given to people who support BLM.
They're called Marxist terrorist.
It goes on and on....don't act like it's one sided.
Click to expand...

It is her right to choose. No argument here. It's wrong to make it political and use my tax dollars to fund clinics that kill babies. It's a moral choice. Not a civil choice. You are a living, breathing human. If I pulled you limb from limb, I'd be a horrendous killer. A baby is alive and well at all stages of development. A being that God knew the hairs on their head long before they entered their mothers womb. But, dismembering them is not killing? Sure, it's a woman's choice. But, it should be on her dime.
 
#411
#411
luthervol said:
I've said repeatedly that 93% of the protestors were perfectly within their rights and doing nothing at all wrong.
Don't know how you missed that.
Click to expand...
Yet they are being grouped in with the rest. They're getting fired and put on no-fly lists by the govt (that's 1st amendment stuff). The incoming admin you support has no intention of changing that and will likely double down given history.
 
#412
#412
luthervol said:
lol....No one is trying to silence dissent. That's an absurd proposition.
They are silencing harmful and dangerous propaganda (known lies)
Click to expand...
And it's identified by them as coming from only one side. Do you truly believe that possible? If so you're just a leftist version of Justin
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#413
#413
GVF said:
It is her right to choose. No argument here. It's wrong to make it political and use my tax dollars to fund clinics that kill babies. It's a moral choice. Not a civil choice. You are a living, breathing human. If I pulled you limb from limb, I'd be a horrendous killer. A baby is alive and well at all stages of development. A being that God knew the hairs on their head long before they entered their mothers womb. But, dismembering them is not killing? Sure, it's a woman's choice. But, it should be on her dime.
Click to expand...
Reasonable. I understand your perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#415
#415
GSD82 said:
They had every right to protest. You all used to be in favor of protests and free speech
Click to expand...
It didn't stop at protests, and it was never intended to. These morons clearly thought of themselves as revolutionary patriots about to take the country back. Now they thought that because they're stupid, but the intention was never meant to be limited to a peaceful protest.
 
#416
#416
utvolpj said:
Yet they are being grouped in with the rest. They're getting fired and put on no-fly lists by the govt (that's 1st amendment stuff). The incoming admin you support has no intention of changing that and will likely double down given history.
Click to expand...
If someone is fired for merely attending the rally (which does not include the riot at the Capitol), that is 100% wrong....unless they lied about why they were missing work.
I don't think anyone has been put on a no fly list that wasn't part of the riot at the Capitol.
 
#417
#417
tvolsfan said:
It didn't stop at protests, and it was never intended to. These morons clearly thought of themselves as revolutionary patriots about to take the country back. Now they thought that because they're stupid, but the intention was never meant to be limited to a peaceful protest.
Click to expand...
You radicals are so dishonest. Again how many people were there total? Tens of thousands maybe. How many got in the Capitol? 50. It was a mostly peaceful protest. You all never say a word when people's personal businesses are burned down and the owners killed in some cases but oh no don't knock out a few windows at the Capitol and make queen pelsoi feel a bit scared.
 
#418
#418
tvolsfan said:
It didn't stop at protests, and it was never intended to. These morons clearly thought of themselves as revolutionary patriots about to take the country back. Now they thought that because they're stupid, but the intention was never meant to be limited to a peaceful protest.
Click to expand...
Using luther's number (most lefties are math challenged but go with it) 93% were there for a peaceful purpose. Why is the govt persecuting them when their actions are clearly protected? I know they're protected because I've been reminded of it for months
 
#419
#419
luthervol said:
I don't think anyone has been put on a no fly list that wasn't part of the riot at the Capitol.
Click to expand...
They absolutely have. It's been linked in this thread that anyone identified had been placed on it. This is your party doing it with the power you gave them

being at the Capitol is not a crime
 
#420
#420
utvolpj said:
They absolutely have. It's been linked in this thread that anyone identified had been placed on it. This is your party doing it with the power you gave them

being at the Capitol is not a crime
Click to expand...
I'll go back and look.
 
#421
#421
utvolpj said:
They absolutely have. It's been linked in this thread that anyone identified had been placed on it. This is your party doing it with the power you gave them

being at the Capitol is not a crime
Click to expand...
I just looked through the whole thread and couldn't find anything.
 
#422
#422
utvolpj said:
They absolutely have. It's been linked in this thread that anyone identified had been placed on it. This is your party doing it with the power you gave them

being at the Capitol is not a crime
Click to expand...
I found this.
A US lawmaker has asked aviation security and investigative authorities to place customers who have been identified as committing crimes during the 6 January riot in Washington, DC on the national “no-fly” list.
US lawmaker urges authorities to place rioters on national no-fly list

Which sounds reasonable.
 
#423
#423
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol
#424
#424
utvolpj said:
They absolutely have. It's been linked in this thread that anyone identified had been placed on it. This is your party doing it with the power you gave them

being at the Capitol is not a crime
Click to expand...
And this:
Today, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, released the following statement urging the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to use their authorities to add the violent perpetrators involved in the domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol yesterday to the No-Fly List and keep them off planes:

“Given the heinous domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol yesterday, I am urging the Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to use their authorities to add the names of all identified individuals involved in the attack to the federal No-Fly List and keep them off planes. This should include all individuals identified as having entered the Capitol building—an intrusion which threatened the safety of Members of Congress and staff and served as an attack on our Nation,” Thompson said.

I'm in agreement
 
#425
#425
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb, TrumpedUpVol and hog88
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top