It makes no sense to fire Pruitt, unless you have a guy lined up ready to take the job. And at this point I don't think the options available are worth it. That may change, but given the current pool of coaches, I don't see it.
It makes no sense to fire Pruitt, unless you have a guy lined up ready to take the job. And at this point I don't think the options available are worth it. That may change, but given the current pool of coaches, I don't see it.
Do we have any assistants now that are on 3 year contracts? I thought they were on 2 year contracts but I could be wrong.If Fulmer really allows him to revamp staff then that means Fulmer is promising Pruitt two more years. Any new assistant is going to require a 3 year contract and assurance that Fulmer has Pruitt’s back. This would line up with reports that Fulmer sees this as a 5 year rebuild. I am not saying this is the right move, but it does line up with previous reports.
I hope they have been working on this behind the scenes. If not then they will lose more money next yearIt makes no sense to fire Pruitt, unless you have a guy lined up ready to take the job. And at this point I don't think the options available are worth it. That may change, but given the current pool of coaches, I don't see it.
Stopped reading at “It makes no sense to fire Pruitt.” A lot more reasons to fire him than to keep at this point. Once the recruiting falls off it’s over. Had he been able to hold this class maybe keep him. We’ve seen this movie before with Dooley and Butch.It makes no sense to fire Pruitt, unless you have a guy lined up ready to take the job. And at this point I don't think the options available are worth it. That may change, but given the current pool of coaches, I don't see it.