Recruiting Forum Football Talk III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hubbs says we Steele may have a coaching search but nothing will be done until after Early Signing day.

You’re not using the word Steele properly. What you mean was “Hubbs said Steele could be Freeze’s DC should he choose to move on from Auburn.”
 
I’ve read every account of his story. Bad tweeting wasn’t the killer in any of them. We could keep volleying and returning serve and our positions wouldn’t change. I think he’s a homerun hire and would advance our program...and you don’t.

Actually never said that. He just has a personality that needs to be reigned in, otherwise, he won't be winning for long.
 
Also, maybe I missed it but did we dive way too far into this tweet and come up with some hidden meaning this morning? My apologies if I did miss it.
 
Seems hard to argue that 2017 was better given they didn't win a single conference game, and the 2020 team has already won 2.
So, technically Pruitt has improved the program from worst season of all time to next-to-worst season of all time in only three years. Raise and extension time!
 
@LA Vol

Given Pruitt's rep as being difficult to work with and likely on a short leash, how much of a challenge do you expect getting quality assistant coaches will be for him after anticipated turnover?

Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.
 
Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.
The prospective coach always has all the leverage in these deals. I can't think of a single coach, at least at a big name program, that doesn't have a contract that is totally one-sided in favor of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volsfan_17
Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.
The snowballing effect of sunk cost fallacy.
 
Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.

As you’re typing that up, surely you see how ludicrous it is to keep Pruitt? Why can’t the admin do the same? Absolutely no coach worth his salt will want to come here knowing it’s a win or go home season. Someone that’s struggling financially could say to their agent, “Hey, what’s going on at TN? Do they need any coaches? I need a 1 year payday. Float my name out there.”

If what you’re saying is true, to this ordinary man, the economics of keeping him are far worst than letting him go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top