butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,980
- Likes
- 225,006
I’ve read every account of his story. Bad tweeting wasn’t the killer in any of them. We could keep volleying and returning serve and our positions wouldn’t change. I think he’s a homerun hire and would advance our program...and you don’t.
@LA Vol
Given Pruitt's rep as being difficult to work with and likely on a short leash, how much of a challenge do you expect getting quality assistant coaches will be for him after anticipated turnover?
The prospective coach always has all the leverage in these deals. I can't think of a single coach, at least at a big name program, that doesn't have a contract that is totally one-sided in favor of him.Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.
The snowballing effect of sunk cost fallacy.Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.
Agents will demand high pay, multi-year contracts, big buyouts if they're fired and no/low buyouts if they want to leave, then they'll want to sweeten the deal with bonuses and concessions before trying to scratch any boilerplate clause that's favorable to UT. A call from UT is like being handed a powerball ticket. Just ask Chaney and Ansley how sweet leverage is.