Glocker_Alum_2005
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2013
- Messages
- 5,001
- Likes
- 6,209
To be fair you only said "on staff". He is technically "on staff". Does he have an on field role? No and I see your point to that not being as hard of a hit as an on field coach being hired away. Does that also mean things look bad for Tennessee? No. Not yet. It will if on field guys start leaving for Tulane
I also didn't want chip long over Chaney as OC so I'm not bothered by his departure. Wish him the best.
Because the constant rotation of staff is gonna help literally all of our offensive woes. Stop speculating on a sport that you didn’t play, Cat. It’s in bad taste, my friend.
Still 3 more games to lose.*Witness (page 8418 RF Football Talk Thread 2)
View attachment 327487
The original bet....
View attachment 327489
How about just stating, "if you suck, you gone and we don't owe you ****."
I don't understand why we give coaches the power when they completely suck. I'd rather just see big incentives for doing like the bare minimum like go 6-6 win a bowl game. There is no motivation for Pruitt to even try and right the ship now, he knows he's canned and going to get paid big for it.
Trey Smith, Josh Palmer, and Bryce Thompson if he declares
That’s all I can think of when I try and think who could get drafted from this team this year.
Definitely need to start putting more Vols in the NFL to help with recruiting. Plus, the only real reason I care about the NFL anymore is my fantasy teams and cheering on former Vols.
I just can't make myself believe Chaney has all of a sudden forgot how to be an OC. Something seems amiss.I trust Chaney to be a solid OC if left alone.
I blame Pruitt for most of the issues with the play calling
I think stability with Chaney is more important than a change right now. Next year 7-8 wins is possible and I think Chaney IF ALLOWED to do his job is the man for the job.
I trust Chaney to be a solid OC if left alone.
I blame Pruitt for most of the issues with the play calling
I think stability with Chaney is more important than a change right now. Next year 7-8 wins is possible and I think Chaney IF ALLOWED to do his job is the man for the job.
Dude this is just not how things work. Might there be a coach who is occasionally driven solely by money? Sure.
Yet even if Pruitt was, wouldn’t he try his hardest to keep this job and continue making the big money?
But back to my original point - competitors aren’t driven solely by money. You give the best players (pick any sport) more money than they could’ve ever imagined and they still work their azzes off every day.
Competitors want to win. Whether or not he rights the ship won’t be determined by effort. Bad/incorrect strategy or philosophy, sure. But not lack of motivation.
I trust Chaney to be a solid OC if left alone.
I blame Pruitt for most of the issues with the play calling
I think stability with Chaney is more important than a change right now. Next year 7-8 wins is possible and I think Chaney IF ALLOWED to do his job is the man for the job.
I think true competitors are the exception, not the rule. Your rank and file players, which make up the vast majority of rosters, are there for the money. They compete insofar as it means they maintain a roster spot and continue to make money.Dude this is just not how things work. Might there be a coach who is occasionally driven solely by money? Sure.
Yet even if Pruitt was, wouldn’t he try his hardest to keep this job and continue making the big money?
But back to my original point - competitors aren’t driven solely by money. You give the best players (pick any sport) more money than they could’ve ever imagined and they still work their azzes off every day.
Competitors want to win. Whether or not he rights the ship won’t be determined by effort. Bad/incorrect strategy or philosophy, sure. But not lack of motivation.