2020 Presidential Race

#87,026
#87,026
Orange_Crush said:
qda6Otb3yX.jpeg




Now, claims like these should be easy to verify or debunk.
Click to expand...

True, but who is she, and why would she know? More to the point, why is she the only one saying so, and how could anyone certify an election with that kind of discrepancy? If true, then none of the mail it in voting should count anywhere because that is evidence of massive fraud in the system.
 
#87,028
#87,028
AM64 said:
True, but who is she, and why would she know? More to the point, why is she the only one saying so, and how could anyone certify an election with that kind of discrepancy? If true, then none of the mail it in voting should count anywhere because that is evidence of massive fraud in the system.
Click to expand...


She's not the only one saying so.

Orange_Crush said:
https://video.parler.com/pf/Ul/pfUlddtD8G0G_small.mp4

They counted more mail-in ballots than they sent out?
Click to expand...

ETA: Forensic expert also just made a recommendation I've been waiting on. He advises micro spectrum analysis for the ballots that would show whether mail-in votes were mas produced..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#87,029
#87,029
zeppelin128 said:
All my Bernie bro friends are addicted to Twitter. They send me crap that is supposed to be "news", but it is just some idiot with 5 followers and a laptop.
Click to expand...

It's amazing. Almost like somebody lifting quotes we send back and forth on VN and offering them as news. The devolution of the human intellect and sense of what is real since the internet came into existence is incredible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00, Rifleman, USAFgolferVol and 1 other person
#87,030
#87,030
AM64 said:
True, but who is she, and why would she know? More to the point, why is she the only one saying so, and how could anyone certify an election with that kind of discrepancy? If true, then none of the mail it in voting should count anywhere because that is evidence of massive fraud in the system.
Click to expand...

One thing that has bothered me are the late night ballot dumps and the Dems claim it was due to overwhelming Dem mail in ballots. I even still dispute that tilt, but has anyone confirmed that MIB were being counted in these hours?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#87,032
#87,032
AM64 said:
It's amazing. Almost like somebody lifting quotes we send back and forth on VN and offering them as news. The devolution of the human intellect and sense of what is real since the internet came into existence is incredible.
Click to expand...
Indeed, all political ideologies have mastered the technique.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#87,039
#87,039
Orange_Crush said:
She's not the only one saying so.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but does that number actually include anyone within the process who knows the real count? I'd find it hard to believe with something that obvious that anyone would put his or her signature on a certification form. Of course, there is always the possibility that the system is so corrupt that no one will investigate, so signing the form is just a step (without penalty for perjury) rather than an affirmation of faith in the count. I could believe either because I have no real faith in the election process.

Having worked in corporate/bureaucratic organizations, there were always plenty of "insiders" in the know about what was happening with regards to reorganization or other disruptions in the force. Most of them were wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and Orange_Crush
#87,043
#87,043
Orangeburst said:
One thing that has bothered me are the late night ballot dumps and the Dems claim it was due to overwhelming Dem mail in ballots. I even still dispute that tilt, but has anyone confirmed that MIB were being counted in these hours?
Click to expand...

I'm hard pressed whether to be more disturbed by that or by the mail it in process. I can't figure out how you halt counting for three hours and have a big update, and certainly not how you can have a decreasing count when we don't have negative votes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and Orangeburst
#87,044
#87,044
Terrells Bay88 said:
My guess is that Manafort and Bannon are pardoned next. Cohen and Gates aren't getting one because they flipped. Rittenhouse might get one too if he has a speedy trial.
Click to expand...

Well, Flynn already plead guilty, so no problem with accepting the pardon. Future pardons might create a dilemma for those anxious to cry "witch hunt" when there are subsequent inquiries, as to why a pardon was needed.
 
#87,047
#87,047
hog88 said:
Should take less than an hour to confirm and if so PA has some problems.
Click to expand...
There was an allegation of this nature specific to one county in Pennsylvania last week (Lancaster County) which was debunked on Politifact. False numbers were being used by people pushing an agenda. I suspect this is just more of the same BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#87,049
#87,049
Stew Cook said:
Well, Flynn already plead guilty, so no problem with accepting the pardon. Future pardons might create a dilemma for those anxious to cry "witch hunt" when there are subsequent inquiries, as to why a pardon was needed.
Click to expand...

You agree with coerced confessions? Wouldn't coercion be like torture without the immediate physical harm? If asked about an event fifty times with leading questions, I'd bet almost any one of us would answer "wrong" at least once. That's good enough to qualify as lying to the FBI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and Orangeburst
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top