Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

I remember a couple of months ago someone posted a tweet about Australia. The average Covid death was several years older than the average age of death. Completely bonkers we are worried about this.

I used to check the MA state website regularly because it was a good state covid page. Months ago they had a very visible stat that showed the average age of death. It was 78 back then. I went to the site today to look at it and it wasnt there, at least not as easily visible as it used to be. Guess they figured it didnt fit the narrative very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496
This right here is why the wife and I have the wheels moving to leave Roanoke when our business building lease runs out.

Screenshot_20201021-141918~2.png

Buried in the article, a no sh*t Sherlock moment.
Screenshot_20201021-141931.png
 
Nothing stopping an individual Californian from crossing the border to get the vaccination.

I like it when states tell the feds to piss off.

In this instance the state official is telling the individual, piss on you. A medicine will be offered, after being scientifically approved, and the state is telling the individual too bad, we decide what you should or should not put in your body.

Why would you think the state telling the individual "F you" is worthy of celebrating?

And the feds arent mandating you take this, so this isnt the state telling the feds to piss off.
 
In this instance the state official is telling the individual, piss on you. A medicine will be offered, after being scientifically approved, and the state is telling the individual too bad, we decide what you should or should not put in your body.

Why would you think the state telling the individual "F you" is worthy of celebrating?

What if the Fed said the vaccine was mandatory and a state said piss on the fed?

Sorry but states rights goes both ways.
 
What if the Fed said the vaccine was mandatory and a state said piss on the fed?

Sorry but states rights goes both ways.
I think what he's getting at is that the state should have zero say in 'approving' a vaccine- look at how the government decided people couldn't try drugs to treat this thing at the start of it all.
 
What if the Fed said the vaccine was mandatory and a state said piss on the fed?

Sorry but states rights goes both ways.

Great, I'd be all for it then. But this isnt that.

A medicine being available and some governor saying "no, I will not let my citizens have access to this in my state" is the opposite of freedom. Which is a principle held dearly by people that are more inclined towards state rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496
Great, I'd be all for it then. But this isnt that.

A medicine being available and some governor saying "no, I will not let my citizens have access to this in my state" is the opposite of freedom. Which is a principle held dearly by people that are more inclined towards state rights.
Since this has only been proposed by NY and California, looks like natural selection at work, a win-win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
I think what he's getting at is that the state should have zero say in 'approving' a vaccine- look at how the government decided people couldn't try drugs to treat this thing at the start of it all.

I think the states should have even more say in about everything that goes on within their borders. There is the BORs that supersede state limits but outside of that citizens get what they vote for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandman 423
Great, I'd be all for it then. But this isnt that.

A medicine being available and some governor saying "no, I will not let my citizens have access to this in my state" is the opposite of freedom. Which is a principle held dearly by people that are more inclined towards state rights.

The citizens of CA want their governor to do that so why should anyone including the fed question their wishes?
 
The citizens of CA want their governor to do that so why should anyone including the fed question their wishes?

I don't think states should be in the business of taking away someone's rights. I doubt you'd support California banning guns for its citizens
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
I don't think states should be in the business of taking away someone's rights. I doubt you'd support California banning guns for its citizens

It goes back to my statement about the BORs supersedes states limitations. Vaccines are not covered in the BORs
 
Why would Donald Trump do this??
Ek24esVXYAAsfnS
So to review.... Blue states have a higher unemployment rate and death rate than red states. And the handling of COVID is supposed to be a winning topic for Dems?
 
The citizens of CA want their governor to do that so why should anyone including the fed question their wishes?

You know every citizen of CA wants their governor to do this?

And those that do, they need a governor to restrict use of a medicine in order for to keep said medicine out of their body?
 
In this instance the state official is telling the individual, piss on you. A medicine will be offered, after being scientifically approved, and the state is telling the individual too bad, we decide what you should or should not put in your body.

Why would you think the state telling the individual "F you" is worthy of celebrating?

And the feds arent mandating you take this, so this isnt the state telling the feds to piss off.
Why cant the person go out of state to get the vaccine?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top