Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure if I agree with this. What parts of the offensive play calling were you unhappy with?

Too pass happy on drives where we should have been running the ball.

Repeatedly called intermediate to longer pass plays when JG was overthrowing his receivers consistently.

Should have called more shorter pass routes, screens, and TE draws. More higher percentage plays.
 
Did crouch get hurt or just benched?

I thought banks was our best LB tonight. 11 didn’t impress me at all tonight outside of the obvious
 
I wasn't sure what to make of the D's letdowns at times. We had pressure at times, but I know usc likes quick throws and they ripped us on some drives, especially Shi Smith. Hopefully that was just missing Sham, Tank, etc.

@HankHill what did you think of our defense or what Bobo adjusted to in the 2nd half?
the linbackers are inside too much and the put the slot to the left and crashed boundary side and got their run game going. linebacker backer covering the middle not good either. when banks came on the side made some plays but he has to play smarter and quit the penalties. unacceptable 2 stupid ass penalties
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX
Too pass happy on drives where we should have been running the ball.

Repeatedly called intermediate to longer pass plays when JG was overthrowing his receivers consistently.

Should have called more shorter pass routes, screens, and TE draws. More higher percentage plays.

I agree with everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeShade
Find something else to Butch about. We finished the game in the victory formation.

that’s what wrong with just looking at what happens the next play. That doesn’t excuse a clearly ignorant clock management issue. It’s a bad sign that In year 3 the HC doesn’t have enough sense to let those 6 seconds run off the clock. Could have easily been a game deciding play and I don’t know why we wait until it loses us a game to discuss it
 
huh?

Don’t you just report As eligible and I didn’t think numbers in the 90s were eligible numbers anyways. Am I wrong ?
50-79 aren’t eligible unless they report. They could’ve reported each time with their usual numbers but maybe that would create unneeded attention to an unusual situation when they were never going to play their traditional line positions anyways.
 
that’s what wrong with just looking at what happens the next play. That doesn’t excuse a clearly ignorant clock management issue. It’s a bad sign that In year 3 the HC doesn’t have enough sense to let those 6 seconds run off the clock. Could have easily been a game deciding play and I don’t know why we wait until it loses us a game to discuss it
And yet it was not. So, "easily" is not how I would characterize it.
 
50-79 aren’t eligible unless they report. They could’ve reported each time with their usual numbers but maybe that would create unneeded attention to an unusual situation when they were never going to play their traditional line positions anyways.

Are 90s eligible ?

I thought only 80-89
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top