vol4eva
Ding!
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2007
- Messages
- 24,110
- Likes
- 17,932
Not sure if I agree with this. What parts of the offensive play calling were you unhappy with?
the linbackers are inside too much and the put the slot to the left and crashed boundary side and got their run game going. linebacker backer covering the middle not good either. when banks came on the side made some plays but he has to play smarter and quit the penalties. unacceptable 2 stupid ass penaltiesI wasn't sure what to make of the D's letdowns at times. We had pressure at times, but I know usc likes quick throws and they ripped us on some drives, especially Shi Smith. Hopefully that was just missing Sham, Tank, etc.
@HankHill what did you think of our defense or what Bobo adjusted to in the 2nd half?
Find something else to Butch about. We finished the game in the victory formation.
50-79 aren’t eligible unless they report. They could’ve reported each time with their usual numbers but maybe that would create unneeded attention to an unusual situation when they were never going to play their traditional line positions anyways.huh?
Don’t you just report As eligible and I didn’t think numbers in the 90s were eligible numbers anyways. Am I wrong ?
And yet it was not. So, "easily" is not how I would characterize it.that’s what wrong with just looking at what happens the next play. That doesn’t excuse a clearly ignorant clock management issue. It’s a bad sign that In year 3 the HC doesn’t have enough sense to let those 6 seconds run off the clock. Could have easily been a game deciding play and I don’t know why we wait until it loses us a game to discuss it