... or how about when Senate Republicans refuse to take up a vote for a Supreme Court nominee in February of an election year, and so the seat stays vacant for over a year? The way Merrick Garland was treated was wrong. It does serve as an "all purpose" retort to your sort of hyperbolic slop. Garland was a qualified moderate.The senate is a judge confirming machine. It’s only deterred when Dems accuse innocent people of running underage sex rings
If Trump wins? They don't have an "Avenue of attack". If Biden wins, it's clear as day. Republican Senators told us in 2016 that a lame duck president shouldn't be nominating Supreme Court Justices.So, assuming hypothetically that the nominee will be a woman, what will be the Democrats' Avenue of attack?
... or how about when Senate Republicans refuse to take up a vote for a Supreme Court nominee in February of an election year, and so the seat stays vacant for over a year? The way Merrick Garland was treated was wrong. It does serve as an "all purpose" retort to your sort of hyperbolic slop. Garland was a qualified moderate.
Oh dang, I missed how republicans accused Merrick Garland of being a rapist who ran an underage sex ring... or how about when Senate Republicans refuse to take up a vote for a Supreme Court nominee in February of an election year, and so the seat stays vacant for over a year? The way Merrick Garland was treated was wrong. It does serve as an "all purpose" retort to your sort of hyperbolic slop. Garland was a qualified moderate.
He is. In fact he sent my daughter a letter congratulating her on her graduation from GT a few months ago. I framed the letter along with an 8 x 10 photo of us with the Carters when my daughter was 2. She now has it hanging proudly in her apartment.Is that Carter fellow still alive? Asking for a friend.
