American war dead are "Losers and Suckers," per Trump

The fact you are content with Biden shows that your loyalty to party politics allows you to overlook an obviously subpar candidate that has shown plenty of reason as to why he should not hold the office. It has nothing to do with Trump, who has also shown plenty of reason as to why he should not hold the office. We have been force fed two horrible candidates, and the majority of America is going to pick one or the other like a good little puppet, which is basically what we have become, puppets waiting for one party or the other to pull our strings. It's bull ****, and at some point, people need to say enough and demand better.
The President only has power if both chambers are controlled by his party
 
Buttigeg said the President must think people like him are suckers for believing this made up story.............well.....everyone knew long before the story Butti..
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
It's just a bit "curious" that this news comes to light now over an incident or incidents that happened 2 years ago. Why now?

I think this story was broken, when it was, to push the "Nancy Does Her Hair" off of the news cycle. The endless loop at the WH briefing probably tweaked "someone" a little bit too hard.

They were probably going to break it closer to the election, (depending how the debates and polls go), but circumstances dictated otherwise. Looks a lot like the "Grabs" tape from the last election.

I bet you there are more "Trump Is Nasty" stories from "inside the administration" to come the closer we get to November. Biden doesn't exactly live in an insulated world either, (although he and his allies are trying). I can see some stuff coming out on him too.

Politics is a nasty business.

They are going to need something bigger than this to get anyone to change their vote to Biden and the flock of harpies that he will be bringing with him if he's elected.
 
It's just a bit "curious" that this news comes to light now over an incident or incidents that happened 2 years ago. Why now?

I think this story was broken, when it was, to push the "Nancy Does Her Hair" off of the news cycle. The endless loop at the WH briefing probably tweaked "someone" a little bit too hard.

They were probably going to break it closer to the election, (depending how the debates and polls go), but circumstances dictated otherwise. Looks a lot like the "Grabs" tape from the last election.

I bet you there are more "Trump Is Nasty" stories from "inside the administration" to come the closer we get to November. Biden doesn't exactly live in an insulated world either, (although he and his allies are trying). I can see some stuff coming out on him too.

Politics is a nasty business.

They are going to need something bigger than this to get anyone to change their vote to Biden and the flock of harpies that he will be bringing with him if he's elected.
that's what I was thinking, the high hypocrite priestess gets busted and then a story from 2018 appears.
 
It's just a bit "curious" that this news comes to light now over an incident or incidents that happened 2 years ago. Why now?

I think this story was broken, when it was, to push the "Nancy Does Her Hair" off of the news cycle. The endless loop at the WH briefing probably tweaked "someone" a little bit too hard.

They were probably going to break it closer to the election, (depending how the debates and polls go), but circumstances dictated otherwise. Looks a lot like the "Grabs" tape from the last election.

I bet you there are more "Trump Is Nasty" stories from "inside the administration" to come the closer we get to November. Biden doesn't exactly live in an insulated world either, (although he and his allies are trying). I can see some stuff coming out on him too.

Politics is a nasty business.

They are going to need something bigger than this to get anyone to change their vote to Biden and the flock of harpies that he will be bringing with him if he's elected.

I think he loses a fair number of vets. Will it be a wholesale shift? No. The racism/white grievanve is just too enticing for some. But every vote counts in places like PA, MI, WI and FL
 
I think he loses a fair number of vets. Will it be a wholesale shift? No. The racism/white grievanve is just too enticing for some. But every vote counts in places like PA, MI, WI and FL
Democrats are the internal threat to America. All honorable Vets know that. Any loss of votes will be inconsequential.
 
So when the sources are named, they will be dismissed as RINO's.....does the source really matter? Is there a good source that will make people go, ok, this guy really is a POS.

Maybe Trump himself. But then they would call him a RINO and dismiss his admission, meaning he'd again be a "true" Republican and their savior. Ain't GOP logic grand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
Quit trying to hijack the damn thread. This is about Trump calling American veterans suckers and losers.
Yes, because that never happens in the PF. You have zero named sources saying he said this...ZERO. John Roberts also from fox yesterday confirmed with Bolton, who hates trump, he never heard him use that kind of language about the troops. Various NAMED sources who came out and said uh no, he doesn't speak that way about the troops.
Then the lie about why trump didn't visit the Grave site in France.
And your getting spun up over me talking about a lie Biden told? You are ate up.
 
Yes, because that never happens in the PF. You have zero named sources saying he said this...ZERO. John Roberts also from fox yesterday confirmed with Bolton, who hates trump, he never heard him use that kind of language about the troops. Various NAMED sources who came out and said uh no, he doesn't speak that way about the troops.
Then the lie about why trump didn't visit the Grave site in France.
And your getting spun up over me talking about a lie Biden told? You are ate up.

And you forgot to add Trump has never said anything like this before. Oh wait ....
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
I'm kinda done with an anonymous source being the only evidence of something. Anonymous sources are fine to lead a journalist to further investigate and find their own evidence before writing a story.

As the sole driver of a story? Let me know when someone comes forward.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top